Tuesday, October 16, 2018
Alleged Campaign Sign Vandal Accused Of Assaulting State House Rep.
Alleged Campaign Sign Vandal Accused Of Assaulting State House Rep.: Rep. Sarah Anderson was heading out for a day of campaigning Sunday when she saw a man damaging campaign signs near her Plymouth home.
Monday, October 15, 2018
Saturday, October 13, 2018
MuslinKeithEllisonNOTQualified4MNAG2018
Sat.13Oct.2018
To the Above Named, Media, et al
Researchers for the Public Good, Soverign Citizens of Minnesota.
are duly concerned that any persons, Candidates 4 Public Office that are Contrary to the Oath http://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Oath-of-Office/
are not qualified to be on the Ballot for MN Attorney General, must Withdraw or if Elected must be removed.
David Stras is gone
David Stras is gone
COUNT I DFL CHAIR TOM PEREZ AND MUSLIN KEITH ELLISON
AT WAR WITH THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP. Fair Housing, re USSC 10-1032 titled Magner v. Gallagher.
THE QUID PRO QUO EXPLAINED.......................................................................................... 17 The Agreement Was a Quid Pro Quo Exchange .................................................................... 18 Assistant Attorney General PerezFacilitated the Initial Stages of the Quid Pro Quo ........... 21 The Initial Stages of the Quid Pro Quo Confused and Frustrated Career Attorneys ............. 23 HUD’s Purported Reasons for Its Changed Recommendation in Newell Are Unpersuasive and a Pretext for HUD’s Desired Withdrawal of Magner...................................................... 26 The “Consensus” that Emerged for Declining Intervention in Newell Directly Resulted from Assistant Attorney General Perez’s Stewardship of the Quid Pro Quo......................... 31 As Discussions Stalled, Assistant Attorney General Perez Took the Lead and Personally Brokered the Agreement......................................................................................................... 34 The Department of Justice Sacrificed a Strong Case Alleging a “Particularly Egregious Example” of Fraud to Execute the Quid Pro Quo with the City of St. Paul .......................... 37 Assistant Attorney General Perez Offered to Provide the City of St. Paul with Assistance in Dismissing Newell’s Complaint ............................................................................................. 40 Assistant Attorney General Perez Attempted to Cover Up the Presence of Magner as a Factor in the Intervention Decision on Newell ....................................................................... 42 Assistant Attorney General Perez Made Statements to the Committees that Were Largely Contradicted by Other Testimony and Documentary Evidence ............................................. 45 The Ethics and Professional Responsibility Opinions Obtained by Assistant Attorney General Perez Were Not Sufficient to Cover His Actions...................................................... 49 The Department of Justice Likely Violated the Spirit and Intent of the False Claims Act by Internally Calling the Quid Pro Quo a “Settlement”.............................................................. 50 The Quid Pro Quo Exposed Management Failures Within the Department of Justice...
Mar 22, 2012 - Gallagher (Sup. Ct. Docket 10-1032), a case that presented the Supreme Court with the chance to decide whether the disparate impact method of ... In an abrupt turn of events, on February 10, 2012, the parties in Magner v.
SEPARATION OF POWERS
Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution vests "all legislative powers" in the hands of Congress. Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in an important case that asks whether Congress violated this fundamental rule by unconstitutionally delegating its lawmaking authority to the executive branch.
The case is Gundy v. United States. At issue is the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act of 2006 (SORNA), which, among other things, requires convicted sex offenders to register, check in periodically in-person, and share various personal information with the authorities. SORNA imposes various sanctions on those who fail to comply with its terms.
The law also contains this provision: "The Attorney General shall have the authority to specify the applicability of the requirements of this subchapter to sex offenders convicted before the enactment of this chapter…and to prescribe rules for the registration of any such sex offenders." In other words, Congress left it up to the attorney general to determine how to proceed with respect to the estimated 500,000 individuals whose sex crime convictions pre-date SORNA's 2006 passage. Gundy v. U.S. centers on whether that delegation of power is constitutional.
"SORNA's delegation provision grants unguided power to the nation's top prosecutor to expand the scope of criminal laws and to impose burdensome, sometimes lifetime registration requirements on hundreds of thousands of individuals," attorney Sarah Baumgartel told the Supreme Court last week. Her client, a convicted sex offender named Herman Avery Gundy, is one such individual. SORNA's delegation of power to the attorney general, Baumgartel maintained, "combines criminal law-making and executive power in precisely the way that the Constitution was designed to prohibit."
Judging by the oral arguments, at least one member of the Supreme Court seemed quite ready to rule in favor of Baumgartel's position.
"The specific statutory section dealing with pre-enactment offenders says unambiguously that the Attorney General decides whether, how, when, and who, even who. So you don't even know if you're going to be subject to this law," observed Justice Neil Gorsuch. "We say that vague criminal laws must be stricken," Gorsuch continued. "What's vaguer than a blank check to the Attorney General of the United States to determine who he's going to prosecute?"
"That's your argument stated very, very concisely," interjected Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, speaking to Baumgartel. Indeed it was.
Gorsuch made a related point several minutes later while questioning Principal Deputy Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall, who was then at the lectern defending SORNA's constitutionality. "Is there something unusual," Gorsuch asked Wall, "about the Attorney General's presence in this case as the chief prosecutor and kind of a conflict of interest?" Put differently, doesn't SORNA violate the separation of powers because it lets a prosecutor act as a lawmaker?
A few minutes after that, Justice Sonia Sotomayor stepped in to support Gorsuch's line of questioning. "I think a fundamental issue that Justice Gorsuch has been aiming at is—especially in criminal law—is it just to delegate to the Attorney General a fundamental question about who gets covered or doesn't get covered by a statute? That," she told the principal deputy solicitor general, "seems like at the core of what a law is."
It remains to be seen whether or not a majority of the Supreme Court will see this case in the same light as Gorsuch and Sotomayor seem to see it. If the Court does, it will be a significant win both for criminal justice reformers and for critics of executive overreach.
An opinion in Gundy v. U.S. is expected by June 2019.
Ellison Uses Thomas Jefferson's Quran - Washington Post
www.was
hingtonpost.com › Nation › Wires
It reads: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I ...
Jan 5, 2007 - WASHINGTON -- Keith Ellison made history Thursday, becoming the first Muslim member of Congress and punctuating the occasion by taking a ceremonial oath with a Quran once owned by Thomas Jefferson. ... Goode's office did not immediately return phone and e-mail messages for comment. Ellison's ...
dCllison | How Can We Trust Him? | dougwardlowag.com
-
Minnesotans can't trust Ellison in his support for cop killers and open borders.Paid for by DOUG WARDLOW FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL
Search Results
Web results
Keith Maurice Ellison (born August 4, 1963) is an American politician and lawyer who has been .....Ellison also said he hoped his presence as a Muslim among the delegation conveyed a message to the Israelis and Palestinians that "people ...
Political party: Democratic
Leader: Tom Perez
Children: 4
In a message dated 10/12/2018 8:45:49 PM Central Standard Time, bill4dahn@aol.comwrites:
What's the Difference between Keith Ellison Sexual Attracts...?Or U S Senator Al Franken Nasty Grouping while the lady was sleeping...?Keith Ellison slammed over domestic abuse allegations in new campaign ad | Fox News55 years old.The Status Of Keith Ellison being Museum, Who is the Democratic Party of United States Deputy Chairman.He Tell The Party To Speak, They Speak.He's Telling The Democratic Party To Do Nothing in The Scandal and Having Him Resign from both the Minnesota Attorney General Race and the U S Democratic Party as There Party's Deputy Chairman...!How Much Power Does Keith Ellison Have Over His Outcome With The
He Has Plenty Of Democrat / DFL Union Money behind Him.Keith Ellison (MN) Should Step Down From Office he is seeking, Minnesota Attorney General 2018
Democratic Party Chairperson Tom Perez (MD) Secretary Jason Rae (WI) Deputy Chair Keith Ellison (MN) Senate leader Minority Leader
Chuck Schumer (NY)House leader Minority Leader
Nancy Pelosi (CA)Chair of Governors Association Jay Inslee (WA) Founded January 8, 1828; 190 years ago[1] Preceded by Democratic-Republican Party Headquarters 430 South Capitol St. SE,
Washington, D.C., 20003Student wing College Democrats of AmericaHigh School Democrats of America Youth wing Young Democrats of America Women's wing National Federation of Democratic Women Overseas wing Democrats Abroad Bill Dahn651-285-765712 Garden GlenLandfall, MN. 55128Ojb-Sious #408819111BillDahn.Blogspot.comBill Dahn, Freedom/Justice/HumanityFURTHER AFFIANTS SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME EXCEPT BOTH REPUBLICANS, HOMEOWNERS HAVE BEEN VICTIMIZED IN THEIR COMMERCE AND HOMEOWNERS P0ROPERTY RIGHTS.TAKEN WITHOUT QUIET TITLES AND JUST COMPENSATIONS.Makes our Claims re Penalitys of Feloney or Perjury.
Ellison Uses Thomas Jefferson's Quran - Washington Post
www.was
hingtonpost.com › Nation › Wires
It reads: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I ...
Jan 5, 2007 - WASHINGTON -- Keith Ellison made history Thursday, becoming the first Muslim member of Congress and punctuating the occasion by taking a ceremonial oath with a Quran once owned by Thomas Jefferson. ... Goode's office did not immediately return phone and e-mail messages for comment. Ellison's ...
Ellison | How Can We Trust Him? | dougwardlowag.com
-
Minnesotans can't trust Ellison in his support for cop killers and open borders.Paid for by DOUG WARDLOW FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL
Search Results
Web results
Keith Maurice Ellison (born August 4, 1963) is an American politician and lawyer who has been .....Ellison also said he hoped his presence as a Muslim among the delegation conveyed a message to the Israelis and Palestinians that "people ...
Political party: Democratic
Leader: Tom Perez
Children: 4
In a message dated 10/12/2018 8:45:49 PM Central Standard Time, bill4dahn@aol.comwrites:
What's the Difference between Keith Ellison Sexual Attracts...?Or U S Senator Al Franken Nasty Grouping while the lady was sleeping...?Keith Ellison slammed over domestic abuse allegations in new campaign ad | Fox News
Bill Dahn
- 651-285-7657
12 Garden GlenLandfall, MN. 55128Ojb-Sious #408819111BillDahn.Blogspot.comBill Dahn, Freedom/Justice/HumanityFURTHER AFFIANTS SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME EXCEPT BOTH REPUBLICANS, HOMEOWNERS HAVE BEEN VICTIMIZED IN THEIR COMMERCE AND HOMEOWNERS P0ROPERTY RIGHTS.TAKEN WITHOUT QUIET TITLES AND JUST COMPENSATIONS.Makes our Claims re Penalitys of Feloney or Perjury.
Sunday, October 7, 2018
Wednesday, October 3, 2018
RICOCOMPLAINTSvs.DFLTOMPEREZ,MUSLINKEITHELLISON
From: sharon4anderson@aol.com
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com, todd.d.axtell@ci.stpaul.mn.us, john.choi@co.ramsey.mn.us, lori.swanson@state.mn.us, lori.gildea@courts.state.mn.us, tamar.gronvall@state.mn.us, debra.peterson@state.mn.us, admin.info@state.mn.us, deed.customerservice@state.mn.us, info@IronRangeResources.org, general.commerce@state.mn.us, webmaster@doc.state.mn.us, oet.web@state.mn.us, dhs.info@state.mn.us, data.center@metc.state.mn.us, webmaster@pca.state.mn.us, Dps.webmaster@state.mn.us, dorweb.comm@state.mn.us, info@dot.state.mn.us, bruce.gordon@state.mn.us, mark.dayton@state.mn.us, brenda.cassellius@state.mn.us, tom.landwehr@state.mn.us
Sent: 10/3/2018 2:17:37 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: CityStPaul- File #: RES 18-1560 ExcessiveConsumptionpf27SharonAnderson697SurreyAnswer/crossFormalComplaint vs.TomPerez,MuslinKeithEllisonetal
City of Saint Paul - File #: RES 18-1560 ExcessiveConsumptionpf27SharonAnderson697SurreyAnswer/crossRICOMTREASON
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act
COUNT I RICO
Titles amended 18 U.S.C.: Crimes and Criminal Procedure U.S.C.sections created 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968
QUITAM RELATOR MRS. SHARON ANDERSON AKA SCARRELLA On the Graves of Tenants in Common and Murder of Sharons 2n Husband Cpl James R. Anderson Korean Vet suffered Major PTSD HARD CORE Alcoholic.
Comes now in Good faith, Loyal Donald Trump Supporter, mandates Criminal Complaints vs. DFL Chair Tom Perez, V Chair Muslin Keith Ellison,all others similarily situated.
SUMMARY Lawyers board should have notified the Police,
https://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com/2018/08/vawidowsharon4mnattorneygeneral.html
MINNESOTA
OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
COMPLAINT FORMComplainant Name, Address and Phone NumbersComplainant 1:
Mrs. Sharon L Anderson697 Surrey AveSt.Paul, MN 55106Email: sharon4anderson@aol.comHome Phone: (651) 776-5835Respondent Name, Address and Phone NumberKeith Ellison1312 Broadwalk AveMpls, MN 55411Phone: (962) 529-6933Additional InformationRelationship to Lawyer: OtherIf you are someone other than the client, what is your connection to the lawyer?Complaint:Techinally Keith, Muslin since age 19 is using his Congressional Office and Candidate Office of AG to Act at War with President Donald Trump, and the Office of President of USA. contrary to Separation of Powers Doctrine. In Affiants Humble Opinion Keith is inciting Violence, committing Treason using his Lawyers License, also did Swanson and Keith acting with Perez using DFL TO DESTROY ENDORSEMENTS for their pecuniary gain?
http://alphanewsmn.com/keith-ellison-ethics-complaint-minnesota-media-blackout/
DFL CANDIDATES FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL DEBATE:
https://www.tpt.org/almanac/video/dfl-candidates-for-attorney-general-debate-31087/
Keiths Testimony he will not give up V DFL Chair, apparantly Complicit with Chair Tom Perez to Committ Fraud,Bribery, on the State of MNand USSC-10-1032 Titled Magner vs. Gallagher http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s
outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining
intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell
against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in
exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the
Supreme Court,an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair
Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the
Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act.Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule.Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led< br />him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City.
Fredrick Newell, a minister and small-business owner in St. Paul, had spent almost a decade working to improve economic opportunities for low-income residents in his community.
In 2009, Newell filed a whistleblower lawsuit alleging that the City of St. Paul had received tens of millions of dollars of community development funds, including stimulus funding, by
improperly certifying its compliance with federal law.By November 2011, Newell had spent
over two years discussing his case with career attorneys in the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota, and the Civil Fraud Section within the
Justice Department’s Civil Division.These three entities, which had each invested a substantial
amount of time and resources into Newell’s case, regarded this as a strong case potentially worth
as much as $200 million for taxpayers and recommended that the federal government join the suit.These career attorneys even went so far as to prepare a formal memorandum recommending intervention, calling St. Paul’s actions a “particularly egregious example of false certifications.”
All this work was for naught. In late November 2011, Lillehaug made PerezAre you submitting documents with this complaint? NoDocuments submitted by mail must be received within 7 days to be considered part of the complaint. If this Office does not receive accompanying documents, your complaint may be considered based solely on the information contained in this complaint form.Dated: 7/9/2018Additional information and documents must be mailed to:Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility
1500 Landmark Towers
345 St. Peter Street
St. Paul, MN 55102
651-296-3952
1-800-657-3601
Sharon is not a Liar or Lawyer, with 97K Votes in AG Primary, spending and raising no Money is outraged that the Inequities of Domestic Abuse by Muslin Keith Ellison v. Karen Monahan Amy Alexander has not been prosecuted,
a. Character of Hon Judge Brett Kavanaugh is at Risk.
by a very sick Woman Christine Basley aka Mrs. Russell Ford. and her now 6 Lawyers.
Michael Bromwich, Debra Katz with Tys to George Soros etc. Orin Hatch is questioning Bromwich and a very sick Vunerable Christine Basley aka Mrs. Russell Ford.
Wed,3Oct,2018Legal Notice to St. Paul,MN Police Chief Todd Axtell, Ramsey co.Attorney John Choi,Chris Tolbert, Counsel and Henn.Asst Attry,State Attorney Lori Swanson all DFL.Sharon with Standing re; http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (No. 1:12-cv-01785)) on November 2, 2012, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to force compliance with an April 4, 2012, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents relating to possible collusion between the Obama administration and the city of St. Paul, MN, in withdrawing a “disparate impact” appeal pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. HUD has refused all JW FOIA requests for public records, even after JW paid in advance for the information.DOJ’S QUID PRO QUO WITH ST. PAUL: HOW ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL THOMAS PEREZ MANIPULATED JUSTICE AND IGNORED THE RULE OF LAW Joint Staff Report United States Congress 113th Congress April 15, 201Executive Summary In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City.Please take this as Long Form Complaint vs.DFL City St. Paul,Mayor Melvin Carter, Amy Brendmoen aka Mrs. Mike Hahn re RICO ACT iN THE MATTER OF MUSLIN KEITH ELELISON DOMESTIC ABUSE, TOM PEREZ Obstruction of Justicetom Perez pic
"I Will Not Shut Up" Watch Lindsey Graham Is On FIRE Crushes Senate In Kavanaugh
IN THE MATTER IFFRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2006
SUMMARY RACKETEERING LAW SUITS AGAINST CITY OF ST. PAUL
LAWSUIT SUMMARY
May, 2004 Steinhauser, Meysembourg, Brisson file Federal Raketeering lawsuit
against the city of St. Paul. Court file #04-2632 JNE/SRN
June, 2004 City launches false criminal charges against Steinhauser. On the day of
Trial, the city of St. Paul moves to dismiss the charges. City inspectors
make the following note in the paperwork: “this is the property owner who
is part of a major lawsuit against us for harassment!!!”
June, 2004 City goes after Steinhauser witness Steve Johnson in Ramsey County
court with false Restraining Order. At trial the matter was dismissed
without Johnson producing a single witness, and the judge commentingthat there was no basis in law or fact for the relief sought by the city.
August, 2004 City goes after another Steinhauser witness named Bee Vue by using a
fraudulent mailing scheme to start a civil lawsuit for trumped up code
violations at 707 Preble.
March, 2005 Harrilal, Johnson, Vue file Federal Racketeering lawsuit against the City
St. Paul. Court file #05-461 JNE/SRN
July, 2005 Gallagher, Collins, Dadder’s Properties, Dadder’s Estates, Dadder’s
Enterprises, Dadder’s Holdings, Troy Allison file Federal Racketeering
Lawuist against the City of St. Paul. Court file #05-1348 JNE/SRN
December 21, 2005 Jeff & Sara Kubitschek join Federal Racketeering lawsuit
Court file #05-1348 JNE/SRN
April 25, 2006 Denise Simmons files “Notice of Claim” alleging several violations of
Federal law regarding her house on Sherburne. These notices are usually
the first step in filing a lawsuit.
June, 2006 Akinwale Akinropo files “Notice of Claim” on her property on Bates.
These notices are usually the first step in filing a lawsuit.
As of right now, the Plaintiffs and Defendants are taking Depositions and serving their
serving their “expert reports” on each other.
According to the “Pretrial Scheduling Order” the cases have to be ready for trial on
September 1, 2007.COUNT II TREASON
18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)Treason - Wikipedia
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.comparable to Rachell Mitchell https://www.axios.com/brett-kavanaugh-rachel-mitchell-prosecutor-memo-2c3233cc-1d42-416b-af04-02700aa9a711.html
referred to /dakota co. attorney James Backstrom,COUNT III 15usc Reducing Affiant to Poverty via Bogus Excessive Consumption http://sharon4anderson.org
City of Saint Paul - File #: RES 18-1560Antitrust Violations. Violations of laws designed to protect trade and commerce from abusive practices such as price-fixing, restraints, price discrimination, and monopolization. The principal federal antitrust laws are the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1-7) and the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 12-27).
File #: RES 18-1560 Version: 1 Name: Excessive/Inspection Service May 22 to June 20, 2018
Type: Resolution Status: Agenda Ready
In control: City Council
Final action:
Title: Approving the City’s cost of providing Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during May 22 to June 20, 2018, and setting date of Legislative Hearing for November 6, 2018 and City Council public hearing for January 2, 2019 to consider and levy the assessments against individual properties. (File No. J1902E, Assessment No. 198301)
Sponsors: Amy Brendmoen
Attachments: 1. Report of Completion, 2. Assessment Roll
Date Name District Opinion Comment Action 10/3/2018 5:08 PM St.Paul Against http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07Rat***Legal_22.pd unconstitutional Without LongForm Complaint AntiTrust http://taxthemax.blogspot.comAmy Brendmoen aka Mrs. Mike Hahn is Muslin Keith Ellison Supporter,AnswerCross over 500K Guide yourselves Accordingly http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdfEdSmithDFL STALKING CANDIDATE VA WIDOW Mrs. Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella10:23:05 9/5/2018 Public Improvement Assessment Roll by Address Project: J1902E Assmt: 198301 Manager: TJT Page 27
Ratification Date: Resolution #:
Owner or Taxpayer Property Description Item Description Unit Rate Quantity Charge Amts Property ID
Sharon Lee Anderson
697 Surrey Av
St Paul MN 55106-5521
*697 SURREY AVE
*Ward: 7
*Pending as of: 8/3/2018
LYMAN DAYTON ADDITION TO THE
CITY OF ST. PAUL LOT 5 BLK 46
Excessive Inspection 1.00 122.00 $122.00 32-29-22-41-0053
Real Estate Admin Fee 35.00 1.00 $35.00
$157.00Legal Notice ObjectionLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: HEALTHCARE http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com
http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdf
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogsbd pot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4andersonHomestead Act of 1862| ScriDocument's are based on SEC filings,| www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)