Sat.13Oct.2018
To the Above Named, Media, et al
Researchers for the Public Good, Soverign Citizens of Minnesota.
are duly concerned that any persons, Candidates 4 Public Office that are Contrary to the Oath http://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Oath-of-Office/
are not qualified to be on the Ballot for MN Attorney General, must Withdraw or if Elected must be removed.
David Stras is gone
David Stras is gone
COUNT I DFL CHAIR TOM PEREZ AND MUSLIN KEITH ELLISON
AT WAR WITH THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP. Fair Housing, re USSC 10-1032 titled Magner v. Gallagher.
THE QUID PRO QUO EXPLAINED.......................................................................................... 17 The Agreement Was a Quid Pro Quo Exchange .................................................................... 18 Assistant Attorney General PerezFacilitated the Initial Stages of the Quid Pro Quo ........... 21 The Initial Stages of the Quid Pro Quo Confused and Frustrated Career Attorneys ............. 23 HUD’s Purported Reasons for Its Changed Recommendation in Newell Are Unpersuasive and a Pretext for HUD’s Desired Withdrawal of Magner...................................................... 26 The “Consensus” that Emerged for Declining Intervention in Newell Directly Resulted from Assistant Attorney General Perez’s Stewardship of the Quid Pro Quo......................... 31 As Discussions Stalled, Assistant Attorney General Perez Took the Lead and Personally Brokered the Agreement......................................................................................................... 34 The Department of Justice Sacrificed a Strong Case Alleging a “Particularly Egregious Example” of Fraud to Execute the Quid Pro Quo with the City of St. Paul .......................... 37 Assistant Attorney General Perez Offered to Provide the City of St. Paul with Assistance in Dismissing Newell’s Complaint ............................................................................................. 40 Assistant Attorney General Perez Attempted to Cover Up the Presence of Magner as a Factor in the Intervention Decision on Newell ....................................................................... 42 Assistant Attorney General Perez Made Statements to the Committees that Were Largely Contradicted by Other Testimony and Documentary Evidence ............................................. 45 The Ethics and Professional Responsibility Opinions Obtained by Assistant Attorney General Perez Were Not Sufficient to Cover His Actions...................................................... 49 The Department of Justice Likely Violated the Spirit and Intent of the False Claims Act by Internally Calling the Quid Pro Quo a “Settlement”.............................................................. 50 The Quid Pro Quo Exposed Management Failures Within the Department of Justice...
Mar 22, 2012 - Gallagher (Sup. Ct. Docket 10-1032), a case that presented the Supreme Court with the chance to decide whether the disparate impact method of ... In an abrupt turn of events, on February 10, 2012, the parties in Magner v.
SEPARATION OF POWERS
Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution vests "all legislative powers" in the hands of Congress. Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in an important case that asks whether Congress violated this fundamental rule by unconstitutionally delegating its lawmaking authority to the executive branch.
The case is Gundy v. United States. At issue is the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act of 2006 (SORNA), which, among other things, requires convicted sex offenders to register, check in periodically in-person, and share various personal information with the authorities. SORNA imposes various sanctions on those who fail to comply with its terms.
The law also contains this provision: "The Attorney General shall have the authority to specify the applicability of the requirements of this subchapter to sex offenders convicted before the enactment of this chapter…and to prescribe rules for the registration of any such sex offenders." In other words, Congress left it up to the attorney general to determine how to proceed with respect to the estimated 500,000 individuals whose sex crime convictions pre-date SORNA's 2006 passage. Gundy v. U.S. centers on whether that delegation of power is constitutional.
"SORNA's delegation provision grants unguided power to the nation's top prosecutor to expand the scope of criminal laws and to impose burdensome, sometimes lifetime registration requirements on hundreds of thousands of individuals," attorney Sarah Baumgartel told the Supreme Court last week. Her client, a convicted sex offender named Herman Avery Gundy, is one such individual. SORNA's delegation of power to the attorney general, Baumgartel maintained, "combines criminal law-making and executive power in precisely the way that the Constitution was designed to prohibit."
Judging by the oral arguments, at least one member of the Supreme Court seemed quite ready to rule in favor of Baumgartel's position.
"The specific statutory section dealing with pre-enactment offenders says unambiguously that the Attorney General decides whether, how, when, and who, even who. So you don't even know if you're going to be subject to this law," observed Justice Neil Gorsuch. "We say that vague criminal laws must be stricken," Gorsuch continued. "What's vaguer than a blank check to the Attorney General of the United States to determine who he's going to prosecute?"
"That's your argument stated very, very concisely," interjected Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, speaking to Baumgartel. Indeed it was.
Gorsuch made a related point several minutes later while questioning Principal Deputy Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall, who was then at the lectern defending SORNA's constitutionality. "Is there something unusual," Gorsuch asked Wall, "about the Attorney General's presence in this case as the chief prosecutor and kind of a conflict of interest?" Put differently, doesn't SORNA violate the separation of powers because it lets a prosecutor act as a lawmaker?
A few minutes after that, Justice Sonia Sotomayor stepped in to support Gorsuch's line of questioning. "I think a fundamental issue that Justice Gorsuch has been aiming at is—especially in criminal law—is it just to delegate to the Attorney General a fundamental question about who gets covered or doesn't get covered by a statute? That," she told the principal deputy solicitor general, "seems like at the core of what a law is."
It remains to be seen whether or not a majority of the Supreme Court will see this case in the same light as Gorsuch and Sotomayor seem to see it. If the Court does, it will be a significant win both for criminal justice reformers and for critics of executive overreach.
An opinion in Gundy v. U.S. is expected by June 2019.
Ellison Uses Thomas Jefferson's Quran - Washington Post
www.was
hingtonpost.com › Nation › Wires
It reads: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I ...
Jan 5, 2007 - WASHINGTON -- Keith Ellison made history Thursday, becoming the first Muslim member of Congress and punctuating the occasion by taking a ceremonial oath with a Quran once owned by Thomas Jefferson. ... Goode's office did not immediately return phone and e-mail messages for comment. Ellison's ...
dCllison | How Can We Trust Him? | dougwardlowag.com
-
Paid for by DOUG WARDLOW FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL
Search Results
Web results
Keith Maurice Ellison (born August 4, 1963) is an American politician and lawyer who has been .....Ellison also said he hoped his presence as a Muslim among the delegation conveyed a message to the Israelis and Palestinians that "people ...
Political party: Democratic
Leader: Tom Perez
Children: 4
In a message dated 10/12/2018 8:45:49 PM Central Standard Time, bill4dahn@aol.comwrites:
What's the Difference between Keith Ellison Sexual Attracts...?Or U S Senator Al Franken Nasty Grouping while the lady was sleeping...?Keith Ellison slammed over domestic abuse allegations in new campaign ad | Fox News55 years old.The Status Of Keith Ellison being Museum, Who is the Democratic Party of United States Deputy Chairman.He Tell The Party To Speak, They Speak.He's Telling The Democratic Party To Do Nothing in The Scandal and Having Him Resign from both the Minnesota Attorney General Race and the U S Democratic Party as There Party's Deputy Chairman...!How Much Power Does Keith Ellison Have Over His Outcome With The
He Has Plenty Of Democrat / DFL Union Money behind Him.Keith Ellison (MN) Should Step Down From Office he is seeking, Minnesota Attorney General 2018
Democratic Party Chairperson Tom Perez (MD) Secretary Jason Rae (WI) Deputy Chair Keith Ellison (MN) Senate leader Minority Leader
Chuck Schumer (NY)House leader Minority Leader
Nancy Pelosi (CA)Chair of Governors Association Jay Inslee (WA) Founded January 8, 1828[1] Preceded by Democratic-Republican Party Headquarters 430 South Capitol St. SE,
Washington, D.C., 20003Student wing College Democrats of AmericaHigh School Democrats of America Youth wing Young Democrats of America Women's wing National Federation of Democratic Women Overseas wing Democrats Abroad Bill Dahn651-285-765712 Garden GlenLandfall, MN. 55128Ojb-Sious #408819111BillDahn.Blogspot.comBill Dahn, Freedom/Justice/HumanityFURTHER AFFIANTS SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME EXCEPT BOTH REPUBLICANS, HOMEOWNERS HAVE BEEN VICTIMIZED IN THEIR COMMERCE AND HOMEOWNERS P0ROPERTY RIGHTS.TAKEN WITHOUT QUIET TITLES AND JUST COMPENSATIONS.Makes our Claims re Penalitys of Feloney or Perjury.
Ellison Uses Thomas Jefferson's Quran - Washington Post
www.was
hingtonpost.com › Nation › Wires
It reads: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I ...
Jan 5, 2007 - WASHINGTON -- Keith Ellison made history Thursday, becoming the first Muslim member of Congress and punctuating the occasion by taking a ceremonial oath with a Quran once owned by Thomas Jefferson. ... Goode's office did not immediately return phone and e-mail messages for comment. Ellison's ...
Ellison | How Can We Trust Him? | dougwardlowag.com
-
Paid for by DOUG WARDLOW FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL
Search Results
Web results
Keith Maurice Ellison (born August 4, 1963) is an American politician and lawyer who has been .....Ellison also said he hoped his presence as a Muslim among the delegation conveyed a message to the Israelis and Palestinians that "people ...
Political party: Democratic
Leader: Tom Perez
Children: 4
In a message dated 10/12/2018 8:45:49 PM Central Standard Time, bill4dahn@aol.comwrites:
What's the Difference between Keith Ellison Sexual Attracts...?Or U S Senator Al Franken Nasty Grouping while the lady was sleeping...?Keith Ellison slammed over domestic abuse allegations in new campaign ad | Fox News
Bill Dahn
- 651-285-7657
12 Garden GlenLandfall, MN. 55128Ojb-Sious #408819111BillDahn.Blogspot.comBill Dahn, Freedom/Justice/HumanityFURTHER AFFIANTS SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME EXCEPT BOTH REPUBLICANS, HOMEOWNERS HAVE BEEN VICTIMIZED IN THEIR COMMERCE AND HOMEOWNERS P0ROPERTY RIGHTS.TAKEN WITHOUT QUIET TITLES AND JUST COMPENSATIONS.Makes our Claims re Penalitys of Feloney or Perjury.