Sunday, January 19, 2014
Civil Rights Case Against Judge David Knutson
http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/
http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf
http://www.co.ramsey.mn.us/NR/rdonlyres/0662DB4E-63F4-4E46-8DDF-D91E53ABB3B3/34834/A
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid2667782325001?bckey=AQ~~,AAAAAGBdRBg~,Fa2suEROi7GXAH746o0wzaiSZCyL_zeZ&bctid=2767739664001
http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf
http://www.co.ramsey.mn.us/NR/rdonlyres/0662DB4E-63F4-4E46-8DDF-D91E53ABB3B3/34834/A
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid2667782325001?bckey=AQ~~,AAAAAGBdRBg~,Fa2suEROi7GXAH746o0wzaiSZCyL_zeZ&bctid=2767739664001
Friday, November 15, 2013
Merck$107 millionChina plant for drugsandZioptanadversetoSharonAnderson4MNAG
Merck invests $107 million in China plant for drugs to treat diabetes Also Eye Drops which Affiant Sharon Anderson is allergic to Zioptan unabated by Dr. Steffen of St. Paul Eye Clinic on Grand Ave. St. Paul,MN.
Merck invests $107 million in China plant for drugs to treat diabetes
SHANGHAI (Reuters) - German drugmaker Merck & Co Inc has invested 80 million euros ($107.67 million) in a manufacturing plant in China, the company said on Friday, underlining the importance of the market for global drug firms.
The Shanghai-based facility will come online in 2017, producing drugs to treat China's fast growing number of diabetics as well as cardiovascular and thyroid disorders, Merck's biopharmaceutical unit said.
Spending in the country's healthcare sector is forecast to nearly triple to $1 trillion by 2020 from $357 billion in 2011, according to McKinsey, which has prompted many firms to invest in Chinese facilities and set up joint-ventures with local companies.
The investment comes as international drug companies have come under pressure in China this year with authorities clamping down on the high price premiums many of them enjoy and a number of drugmakers have been caught up in corruption allegations.
British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline is under investigation over allegations it funneled up to 3 billion yuan ($492.43 million) to travel agencies to facilitate bribes to doctors and officials to boost its drug sales.
Merck itself, as well as large international drugmakers Novartis AG, AstraZeneca Plc, Sanofi, Eli Lilly & Co and Bayer AG have also been questioned by Chinese officials this year.
Drugmakers have seen their sales suffer in the wake of the probes, with many Chinese doctors refusing to see drug representatives for fear of being caught up in the widening scandal.
GSK's third-quarter China sales fell 61 percent, while Sanofi lowered its 2013 profit guidance on China weakness.
Industry insiders said that despite any roadbumps, international drug firms would be unlikely to turn their back on China, which is set to be the second-biggest drugs market behind the United States by 2016, according to IMS Health.
"In 10 years it's conceivable that China will become the largest pharmaceutical market in the world," said Benjamin Bai, Shanghai-based partner at law firm Allen & Overy. "Do you think (drug firms) can afford to get out of China? No, even if it's difficult, they will find a way to adapt."
($1 = 6.0922 Chinese yuan)
($1 = 0.7430 euros)
(Reporting by Adam Jourdan)
The Shanghai-based facility will come online in 2017, producing drugs to treat China's fast growing number of diabetics as well as cardiovascular and thyroid disorders, Merck's biopharmaceutical unit said.
Spending in the country's healthcare sector is forecast to nearly triple to $1 trillion by 2020 from $357 billion in 2011, according to McKinsey, which has prompted many firms to invest in Chinese facilities and set up joint-ventures with local companies.
The investment comes as international drug companies have come under pressure in China this year with authorities clamping down on the high price premiums many of them enjoy and a number of drugmakers have been caught up in corruption allegations.
Merck itself, as well as large international drugmakers Novartis AG, AstraZeneca Plc, Sanofi, Eli Lilly & Co and Bayer AG have also been questioned by Chinese officials this year.
Drugmakers have seen their sales suffer in the wake of the probes, with many Chinese doctors refusing to see drug representatives for fear of being caught up in the widening scandal.
GSK's third-quarter China sales fell 61 percent, while Sanofi lowered its 2013 profit guidance on China weakness.
Industry insiders said that despite any roadbumps, international drug firms would be unlikely to turn their back on China, which is set to be the second-biggest drugs market behind the United States by 2016, according to IMS Health.
"In 10 years it's conceivable that China will become the largest pharmaceutical market in the world," said Benjamin Bai, Shanghai-based partner at law firm Allen & Overy. "Do you think (drug firms) can afford to get out of China? No, even if it's difficult, they will find a way to adapt."
($1 = 6.0922 Chinese yuan)
($1 = 0.7430 euros)
(Reporting by Adam Jourdan)
Monday, November 11, 2013
HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in “Disparate Impact” Discrimination Cases | Judicial Watch
HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in “Disparate Impact” Discrimination Cases | Judicial Watch
From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com, andrews@nlc.org
CC: bomberg@nlc.org, editor@blognetnews.com, editor@pioneerpress.com, editors@myvillager.com, whistleblowers@startribune.com
Sent: 11/11/2013 11:36:35 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Fwd: Colemans ElectionSt.Paul,MN Challange_RelatorSharonAndersonVAWidowSepara...
From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com, andrews@nlc.org
CC: bomberg@nlc.org, editor@blognetnews.com, editor@pioneerpress.com, editors@myvillager.com, whistleblowers@startribune.com
Sent: 11/11/2013 11:36:35 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Fwd: Colemans ElectionSt.Paul,MN Challange_RelatorSharonAndersonVAWidowSepara...
RES 13-1798 Version:1 | Name: | 2013 Election Canvass and Results - to be amended |
Type: | Resolution | Status: | Agenda Ready |
In control: | City Council |
From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
File #: | RES 13-1734 Version:1 | Name: | Election System Replacement JPA |
Type: | Resolution | Status: | Agenda Ready |
In control: | City Council |
Final action: |
Title: | Approving the Joint Powers Agreement with Ramsey County for Election System Replacement. |
Sponsors: | Kathy Lantry |
To: anthony@nlc.org, coleman@nlc.org, mark.dayton@state.mn.us, attorney.general@state.mn.us, john.choi@co.ramsey.mn.us, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, elections.dept@state.mn.us, elections@co.ramsey.mn.us, mark.ritchie@state.mn.us
CC: sharon4anderson@aol.com, fmelo@pioneerpress.com, whistleblowers@startribune.com, holdenformayor@gmail.com, chris.coleman@ci.stpaul.mn.us, shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us, kathy.lantry@ci.stpaul.mn.us, nobodies@att.net
Sent: 11/11/2013 10:45:03 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Colemans ElectionSt.Paul,MN Challenge_RelatorSharonAndersonVAWidowSeparatePowersMon.11Nov2013 Vets DayChris Coleman due to be www.nlc.org Therefore Federal Criminal Statutes may also apply.On the Graves of our Heritage www.petersonfamilytree.blogspot.comGrave of 2nd Husband www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.comCity Criminal CodeWED 6NOV2013 www.ci.stpaul.mn.us When Criminal Acts are Not ...
SEMPER FIhttps://plus.google.com/.../posts/jTPnXAL9kGP1 day ago - 6Nov2013 LEGAL NOTICE TO CITY ST.PAUL CANVASS BOARD made up of the St. Paul City Council and Elections to certify Results 13NOV2013. Joe Manskey ... Tales of Tyranny - The Kay Kohler Story
- Cached
ShareView shared post
Grateful that Chris Coleman apparantly Won the City St.Paul MayoralElection But For Excessive Restrictions $500 Filing FeeWhere the Voters Misled re: Triggering Election ChallengeConstitutionality Canvass and IRV deny primary to bring out the Following Government Reform Doc.WED 6NOV2013When Criminal Acts are Not Abated then FraudMS60x KICKS IN COLEMANS COMPLICITY WITH TOM PEREZWe are Sick and Tired of Secret Meetings in City HallRoom 310, City Hall
Closed Door Session to consider the City’s strategy and position for the potential interest arbitration between the City of Saint Paul and the Saint Paul Police FederationWed. 6Nov2013LEGAL NOTICE TO CITY ST.PAUL CANVASS BOARD made up of the St. Paul City Council and Elections to certify Results 13NOV2013.Joe Manskey www.co.ramsey.mn.usCongratulations to Chris Coleman and Thanks to Trigger www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com Campaign for MNAGHOWEVER 4 EDUCATIONAL RULE OF LAWAFFIANT MUST CHALLENGE THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THECITY CANVASS BOARD AND COLEMANS ELECTION BASEDON FRAUD COMPLICITY WITH TOM PEREZISSUES;By information and Belief the MT HOLLY case may also be dismissed by AssSharons Informal Brief re: FIAFEA_FIRREA_A09-2031 ...
sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/.../sharons-informal-brief-re-fiafea_firr...
t.AG Tom Perez?
- Cached
ShareView shared post
Dec 26, 2009 - FIAFEA FIRREA Banking Regulations – Google Search ... St.Paul City Clerk shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us 651-266-8688 F 266-8574 ... RAMSEY,AUDITOR MARK OSWALD, Elections/Taxes Supervisor, Canvass Board, You've visited this page many times. Last visit: 6/20/13
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that On September 24, 2013, it filed a Freedom of Information (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ((No. 1:13-cv-01451)) against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for all records of communications regarding two controversial “disparate impact” housing discrimination cases, the first (Magner v. Gallagher) dismissed by the Supreme Court in February 2012, and the second (Township of Mt. Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens Association) now scheduled for December 4 adjudication before the Court.Specifically, Judicial Watch seeks the following records pursuant to a July 22, 2013, FOIA request:
- Any and all records regarding the case pending in the Supreme Court as of the date of this request of Township of Mt. Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., including but not limited to communications regarding the possibility of settlement between the parties. This request applies to records regarding this case during any state of its proceedings.
Under the theory of “disparate impact,” a defendant can be held liable for discrimination for a race-neutral policy that statistically disadvantages a specific minority group even if that negative “impact” was neither foreseen nor intended. In such cases, defendants can be forced to pay for harm caused not by their own actions, but by economic and statistical realities, even if beyond their control.
- Any and all records regarding the case dismissed from the Supreme Court on February 14, 2012, of Magner v. Gallagher, including but not limited to communications regarding the dismissal of the case.
The Magner v. Gallagher disparate impact case arose from a lawsuit by a St. Paul minority contractor claiming that the city’s targeted enforcement of the city’s housing code against rental units reduced the availability of low-income rentals, with a disparate impact upon African-Americans. The Eighth Circuit found in the contractor’s favor, after which the city appealed to the Supreme Court. The Obama Department of Justice (DOJ) then intervened, apparently persuading St. Paul to take the extraordinary step of withdrawing its cert petition from the Supreme Court docket.
On February 13, 2012, the Wall Street Journal reported that various federal officials had asked the City of St. Paul to withdraw its petition for certiorari. The Obama administration’s concern, explained the article, was that a legal theory known as “disparate impact” might either: 1) harden into law as used by the landlords who had won at the state level or 2) be eviscerated entirely. Apparently, several federal agencies that rely on that legal theory to secure out-of-court settlements in the consumer lending and family housing arena were reluctant to risk a change in the legal landscape. The next day, the parties to Magner v. Gallagher withdrew their case by mutual consent.
Judicial Watch separately obtained documentsunder the Minnesota Data Practices Act, showing that St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing arranged a meeting between the then-chief of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, current Secretary of Labor Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before the city’s withdrawal from the case, captioned Magner v. Gallagher. Following Perez’s visit, the city withdrew its case and thanked DOJ and officials at HUD for their involvement.
The Township of Mt. Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action disparate impact case involves a redevelopment plan for Mount Holly Gardens, a 30-acre New Jersey neighborhood of run-down housing and high crime. The plan would have transformed the Gardens into mid-range single-family dwellings. Current and former residents of the Gardens banded together as Citizens in Action to sue, claiming that the plan violated the FHA because a majority of them, predominantly African-Americans and Hispanics would not be able to afford the new homes.
The district court dismissed the argument, ruling that the redevelopment plan affected Gardens residents equally, without regard to race, and was tied only to economic considerations. The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed that ruling, holding that left wing group suing the township had established a case of discrimination under the theory of disparate impact because a majority of the affected residents were non-white. On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court agreed to the township’s request to take on the issue.
On September 3, 2013, Judicial Watch filed a brief of amicus curiae with the Supreme Court on behalf of the township of Mt. Holly. In its brief, Judicial Watch argued, “Section 804(a) of the FHA prohibits only disparate treatment, not disparate impact as the Third Circuit has ruled. An analysis of the legislative history only confirms the clear language of the text.”
“We have evidence the Obama administration, through current Labor Secretary Tom Perez, improperly intervened to try to prevent the Supreme Court from shooting down is radical racial legal theories,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama administration and its liberal activist allies are desperate to preserve the discredited theory of ‘disparate impact’ to bludgeon its opponents as racists and violate equal protection under the law.”
http://www.youtube.com/user/lawlessamerica/search?query=Minnesota+Sharon+Anderson http://www.youtube.com/user/lawlessamerica/videos?query=Minnesota http://www.youtube.com/channel/UChwpfgqEZnbFH28fia8byPQ http://www.lawlessamerica.com/images/stories/GRIP/state%20legislation%20proposal-2012-09-26.pdf Sharon4Anderson@aol.com AttorneyProSe_Private AG, ECF 65913 Pacer:sa1299 Tel: 651-776-5835 HEALTH CARE Candidate 2014 MNAG www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruption www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson
Monday, October 28, 2013
St.PaulMayoral Debate: Oh God,ComplicityTomPerez ChrisColeman
Saint Paul Mayoral Debate: Oh God, you didn't just say that! | Up and At ’Em with Jack and Ben
Sharon Anderson · Sharon4Mayor2014.blogspot.com at Candidate MN Justice_and or_Senate 64
To expose High Crimes,Misdemeanors of Chris Coleman, taking a Dive and Bribe to Case Fix in the Magner Case USSC 10-1032 http:// oversight.house.gov/ wp-content/uploads/2013/04/ DOJ-St-Paul.pdf Executive Summary * * * AsstAGThomas E.Perez made a secret deal behing closed doors with Chris Coleman Mayor
To expose High Crimes,Misdemeanors of Chris Coleman, taking a Dive and Bribe to Case Fix in the Magner Case USSC 10-1032 http://
Reply · 1 · Unlike
· Unfollow
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own, but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?
Judgment: Dismissed - Rule 14 on February 14, 2012.
· Unfollow
Magner v. Gallagher
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10-1032 | 8th Cir. | Not Argued | Feb 14, 2012 | N/A | N/A | OT 2011 |
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own, but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?
Judgment: Dismissed - Rule 14 on February 14, 2012.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
Briefs and Documents
Merits Briefs for the Petitioners- Brief of the International Municipal Lawyers Association et al.
- Brief of the Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey
- Brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation et al.
- Brief of the Independent Community Bankers of America et al.
- Brief of the Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc.
- Brief of the American Bankers Association et al.
- Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund
- Brief of the Lawyer’s Committee on Civil Rights et al.
- Brief of the Housing Advocates, Inc., and Buckeye Community Hope Foundation
- Brief of the National Fair Housing Alliance et al.
- Brief of the Opportunity Agenda et al.
- Brief of the ACLU
- Brief of Massachusetts et al.
- Brief of Henry G. Cisneros
- Brief of AARP and Mount Holly Gardens Citizens In Action
Certiorari-stage documents
- Opinion below (8th Cir.)
- Petition for certiorari
- Brief in opposition of respondents Thomas J. Gallagher et al.
- Petitioners' reply
Court opinions for magner v. gallagher | |
Magner v. Gallagher, 132 S. Ct. 1306 - 2012 - Supreme Court - Cited by 14
Magner v. Gallagher, 132 S. Ct. 994 - 2012 - Supreme Court - Cited by 1
Magner v. Gallagher, 132 S. Ct. 548 - 2011 - Supreme Court - Cited by 3
|
Search Results
Magner v. Gallagher : SCOTUSblog
www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/magner-v-gallagher/- Cached
- Similar
- ShareView shared post
You've visited this page many times. Last visit: 3/18/13Magner v. Gallagher (10-1032) | LII / Legal Information Institute
www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/10-1032- Cached
- Similar
- ShareView shared post
You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 9/25/12Magner v. Gallagher | Cato Institute
www.cato.org/publications/legal-briefs/magner-v-gallagher- Cached
- Similar
- ShareView shared post
by I Shapiro - 2012Magner v. Gallagher addresses the question of whether the FHA's ban on racial discrimination can be violated by someone who does not actually engage in ...Magner v. Gallagher | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College ...
www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2011/2011_10_1032- Cached
- Similar
- ShareView shared post
10-1032 - Search - Supreme Court of the United States
www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-1032...- Cached
- Similar
- ShareView shared post
Feb 14 2011Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 18, 2011).Jun 15 2011Brief of respondents Thomas J. Gallagher, et al. in opposition filedYou've visited this page many times. Last visit: 3/18/13Magner vs. Gallagher » City Hall Scoop - Blogs - Pioneer Press
blogs.twincities.com/cityhallscoop/tag/magner-vs-gallagher/- Cached
- Similar
- ShareView shared post
LatinoJustice: Amicus Brief for Magner v. Gallagher
latinojustice.org/briefing_room/press_releases/magner_v_gallagher/- Similar
- ShareView shared post
Magner v. Gallagher | NAACP LDF
www.naacpldf.org/case-issue/magner-v-gallagher- Cached
- Similar
- ShareView shared post
magner v. gallagher | Judicial Watch
www.judicialwatch.org › Document Archive- Cached
- ShareView shared post
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)