SharonsFacebookVideo

Post by Sharon Anderson.

Sunday, December 23, 2012

FamilyCourtCorruptionDocumntaryBill WindsorLawlessAmericaMNLeaBankenCarver Cou...

Sharon at Grand Opening www.facebook.com/uniondepot Blowing a Kiss
www.lawlessamerica.com  Bill Windsor


Published on Nov 25, 2012
Family Court Corruption - Bill Windsor of Lawless America and Carver County Minnesota Victims.

Lea Sage Banken, Bonnie Roy, and Anne Jeske joined Bill Windsor outside the Carver County INjustice Center.

Lawless America...The Movie is all about exposing the fact that we now live in Lawless America. We no longer have laws that are enforced because judges do whatever they want to do. America has also become lawless because government officials are dishonest and/or corrupt.

The movie will expose corruption in every state. The Movie will focus on victims. Corrupt judges and corrupt government officials will be exposed, and we will confront a number of the crooks.

If anyone has ever questioned the story of a person who has expressed the view that they were a victim of the government or of judges, this movie will prove that the odds are that the corruption report was true. In fact, there are probably tens of millions of victims in the United States who never realized what happened to them.

One feature length documentary movie is being produced. It will be shown in theaters, on Netflix, Blockbuster, and other such video places, and the movie will be presented at the Sundance Film Festival and other film festivals.

In addition, videos will be produced for each state and for each type of corruption. Everyone interviewed for the film recorded a three-minute segment that will be done as testimony before Congress as well as a 30-60 minute on-camera interview with Bill Windsor, founder of LawlessAmerica.com and the revolutionary Party. The legislators in each state are receiving the testimony from those in their state, and the members of the U.S. House and Senate will receive all of the testimony nationwide.

Over 750 people were scheduled to be interviewed for the movie.

For more information, see www.LawlessAmerica.com -- www.YouTube.com/lawlessamerica -- www.facebook.com/lawlessamerica -- http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2337260/
From: FreedomLawSchool@yahoogroups.com

  • License



      • Search results for "minnesota":

      at

      Thursday, December 20, 2012

      USSC_Twitter_Sharon4Anderson re: LawlessAmerica,BillWindsor,Lea Banken


                                               Thurs.20Dec2012
                                  MERRY CHRISTMAS_MINNESOTA MOTHERS LOVE
                                                  Please assist to Protect our Familys "Parens Patriae"
                                          Note to Windsor4Wisdom et al Happy Holidays As Nobodies, Victims and Documentary Members of www.lawlessamerica.com www.youtube.com/lawlessamerica
                                         Further Note   MN Attorney General Lori Swanson www.ag.state.mn.us  Candidates et al  https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=8.31&year=2012   
                                   Rough Draft to have the Attorney Generals indict Judges for Judicial Malpractice, exceeding  the AG's Authority of Parens Patriae,?  www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com  Forensic Files www.sharon4anderson.org
                                        40 years ago DFL MNAG Warren Spannus used undue influence to Take my Daughter Vonessa Scarrella aka Cleveland aka Florentine, giving Custody illegally to John and his Mistress Joan Cloyd Gooselaw who Murdered the 10 month old Baby Boy Henry Gooselaw Jr.  Judges in that Case are now Deceased.
                                    UP TO DATE 40 YEARS LATER  JUDGES BARTERING OUR CHILDREN IF WE teach them the Bible and if WE DO NOT TAKE DOWN PUBLIC WEBSITES AND OR BLOGS. RE: LEA BANKEN
          HAS JUDGE RICHARD PERKINS IN THE JUDICIAL BRANCH
      USURPED THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF ATTORNEY GENERAL.

      www.law.cornell.edu › USC › Title 15 › Chapter 1Cached
      (1) Any attorney general of a State may bring a civil action in the name of such State, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in such State, in any ...

      www.bc.edu/dam/files/schools/law/lawreviews/.../42.../04_FMS.htmCached
      10 Many state legislatures have therefore enacted laws making it easier to try .... a waiver of jurisdiction order with a statement listing the reasons for transfer.51 The ..... state legislators, district attorneys, the Attorney General, and the Governor , ..... like a parent was the British doctrine of parens patrie, the State as parent.
                                     QUESTIONS:  HAS THE USA ATTORNEY GENERALS in their Official Capacity's[PDF] 

      The Public Trust Doctrine, Parens Patriae, and the Attorney General ...

      scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1097...delpf
      File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
      by A Kanner - 2005 -       Cited by 61 - Related articles
      Mar 13, 2006 – 57. THE PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE, PARENS. PATRIAE, AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AS. THE GUARDIAN OF THE STATE'S NATURAL ...
      ncpp: National Coalition for Protective Parents Exposing Corruption in Carver County Minnesota Family Court/CPS and Foster Care System. Government Abuse IS Child Abuse for Profit. We The People... are no longer tolerating; TAXPAYER dollars (billions) used to separate, and financially demolish families.  http://www.youtube.com/user/lawlessamerica/videos?query=Minnesota

      Search results for "Minnesota":

       Go to www.lennycarolanderson.blogspot.com  for other MN Video's
                   Bill you have brought to my Attention the Horrors of Judge Perkins destroying Lea Banken Free Speech, Taking down her
      The large number of people at the hearing heard Judge Perkins give no reason why Ms. Banken cannot see her children other than his false assertion that Ms. Banken has not had a psychological evaluation. The truth is that she had an evaluation and it was completely normal. Judge Perkins gave no reason why Ms.During this time she would have no contact with her children and would be unable to protect them. You can see these rulings on the website MNCIS Government Access Resource Center. The case file number is 111452.
      From: n-Funeba4Naqrefba=nby.pbz-ed2a8@postmaster.twitter.com
      To: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
      Sent: 12/18/2012 1:36:17 P.M. Central Standard Time
      Subj: US Supreme Court (@USSupremeCourt1) is now following you on Twitter!

           
      Sharon4Anderson,
      You have a new follower on Twitter.
      		  https://twitter.com/Sharon4Anderson?uid=17092455&iid=am-134278427213558593609954774&nid=23+22

      https://twitter.com/USSupremeCourt1?uid=17092455&iid=am-134278427213558593609954774&nid=23+112
      US Supreme Court
      @USSupremeCourt1
      Follow us to get the latest news about US Supreme Court
      Los Angeles, CA 90012
      Followed by Health Care Lawsuits and jamiedelton.
      Following: 4189 · Followers: 4849
      https://twitter.com/intent/follow?ea_u=17092455&ea_e=1357068961&screen_name=USSupremeCourt1&ea_s=e8a93ca7fe40d514a19c0166b233d30daba299f4&uid=17092455&iid=am-134278427213558593609954774&nid=23+488
      at

      Friday, December 14, 2012

      Congressman Bob Goodlatte to Chair House Judiciary Committee 2013


      Congressman Goodlatte
      Protecting the Right to Work: A Victory in Michigan

      This week we saw another victory for American workers and freedom in the workplace. Just days ago, Michigan Governor Rick Snyder signed into law two right to work bills, making Michigan the twenty-fourth right to work state in our nation, including Virginia. This means individual employees can join unions voluntarily, but unions cannot force membership or force the payment of dues across entire worksites. The news out of Michigan comes just 10 months after Indiana became a right to work state and is a particularly significant trend in the Midwest.
      I have been an ardent and vocal opponent of any efforts by labor leaders to force a man or woman to pay dues to a union in order to work. Folks should have the freedom to decide whether or not they will join a union. This freedom creates healthier unions that are constantly seeking to provide better services to members and prospective members. Eliminating this freedom limits the individual freedom of workers, results in fewer jobs, and makes our nation less competitive versus our foreign competitors.
      As our country struggles to find ways to stay competitive, create more jobs and grow our national economy, states must be looking for commonsense ways to ensure their prosperity. A recent study indicates that there is faster growth in employment and income in states with right to work laws in place.
      I am also a strong supporter of the National Right to Work Act, which preserves and protects the free choice of individual employees to form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such activities. This legislation is simple and reasonable. The bill deletes provisions in federal law that authorizes contracts forcing workers to pay union dues as a condition of employment.
      Some argue that by passing a national right to work law, we will be wiping out a competitive advantage over other states that we currently enjoy in Virginia, thanks to our right to work law. However, our real competitors are Japan, Mexico, China, and Europe--not Ohio, New York, and California. So by making our nation more competitive as a whole, we also help Virginia’s workers and businesses.
      By passing right to work legislation in statehouses or in Congress we can restore the freedom of America's workers to choose the form of workplace representation that best suits their needs or to choose not to participate. Most importantly, we help improve the standard of living of all American workers, support job creation and help keep the jobs we already have right here in the United States. These are the kind of pro-growth, pro-jobs policies we need to help fuel our economic recovery.
      This message was generated from an unattended mailbox. Should you have further questions, please visit the “Contact Bob” section of my website or call my office at (202) 225-5431.
      WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
      2309 Rayburn HOB
      Washington, D.C. 20515
      Phone: (202) 225-5431
      Fax: (202) 225-9681

      HARRISONBURG OFFICE
      2 South Main Street
      Suite A, First Floor
      Harrisonburg, VA 22802
      Phone: (540) 432-2391
      Fax: (540) 432-6593      		LYNCHBURG OFFICE
      916 Main Street Suite 300
      Lynchburg, VA 24504
      Phone: (434) 845-8306
      Fax: (434) 845-8245

      ROANOKE OFFICE
      10 Franklin Road SE
      Suite 540
      Roanoke, VA 24011
      Phone: (540) 857-2672
      Fax: (540) 857-2675      		STAUNTON OFFICE
      117 South Lewis Street Suite 275
      Staunton, VA 24401
      Phone: (540) 885-3861
      Fax: (540) 885-3930      		VISIT CONGRESSMAN
      BOB GOODLATTE'S
      WEBSITE
      NewsroomCurrent IssuesConstituent ServicesAbout BobVisit Congressman Goodlatte on YouTubeVisit Congressman Goodlatte on FacebookVisit Congressman Goodlatte on TwitterThis message was intended for: sharon4anderson@aol.com
      You were added to the system November 30, 2012. For more information
      at

      Wednesday, December 12, 2012

      HUD Sued Records Obama Involvement USSC10-1032_St. Paul, MN, Judicial Watch

      HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial Watch

                                ME TOO  www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
       (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (No. 1:12-cv-01785)) on November 2, 2012, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to force compliance with an April 4, 2012, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents relating to possible collusion between the Obama administration and the city of St. Paul, MN, in withdrawing a “disparate impact” appeal pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. HUD has refused all JW FOIA requests for public records, even after JW paid in advance for the information.
      The disparate impact case arose from a lawsuit by a St. Paul minority contractor claiming that the city’s targeted enforcement of the city’s housing code against rental units reduced the availability of low-income rentals, with a disparate impact upon African-Americans. The Eighth Circuit found in the contractor’s favor, after which the city appealed to the Supreme Court. Generally speaking, under a disparate impact analysis, an entity can be found to have engaged in discriminatory activity for practices that merely have a “disparate impact” on protected minorities, irrespective of any intentional bias.
      The Obama DOJ then intervened, apparently persuading St. Paul to take the extraordinary step of withdrawing its cert petition from the Supreme Court docket. On February 13, the Wall Street Journal reported that various federal officials had asked the City of St. Paul to withdraw its petition for certiorari in a controversy that had already been slated for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court.
      The Obama administration’s concern, explained the article, was that a legal theory known as “disparate impact” might either: 1) harden into law as used by the landlords who had won at the state level or 2) be eviscerated entirely.  Apparently, several federal agencies that rely on that legal theory to secure out-of-court settlements in the consumer lending and family housing arena were reluctant to risk a change in the legal landscape.  The next day, the parties to Magner v. Gallagher withdrew their case by mutual consent.
      Judicial Watch separately obtained documents under the Minnesota Data Practices Act, showing that St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing arranged a meeting between the chief of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before the city’s withdrawal from the case, captioned Magner v. Gallagher. Following Perez’s visit, the city withdrew its case and thanked DOJ and officials at HUD for their involvement.
      On April 4, Judicial Watch sent a FOIA request to the DOJ and HUD seeking access to the following:
      1. All communications with or about St. Paul, Minnesota, its residents, landlords, low-income properties or employees, specifically those exchanges:
      a. relating to the city’s recent petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, including the petition’s withdrawal in February 2012;
      b. regarding “disparate impact” theory or analysis in the housing, landlord-tenant, or mortgage arena;
      c. involving any member of the U.S. Senate’s Democratic Policy & Communications Committee, the House Democratic Caucus, or the White House, and their respective staffs; and,
      d. involving third parties such as the National Low Income Housing Coalition, Thomas Goldstein, orWalter Mondale and their respective staffs;
      2.  All invoices for travel, food, lodging, communications, or entertainment expenses incurred in connection with any “disparate impact” lawsuit against St. Paul, Minnesota.
      In filing its FOIA request, JW requested a waiver of both search and duplication fees, citing its role as a member of the news media. On June 11, 2012, HUD denied JW’s waiver request, informing JW that it would be required to pay a $1,024.43 fee before HUD would release any records.
      On June 21, 2012, JW appealed HUD’s denial of a waiver request. On July 23, HUD denied JW’s appeal, and on July 31, JW paid the waiver fee in full.
      Despite payment in full, and despite repeated inquiries from JW about the status of its FOIA request, HUD has continued to refuse to release of the documents requested by JW.
      “We have reason to believe that the Obama administration improperly and successfully pressured St. Paul city officials to take the extremely rare action of withdrawing an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama administration and its liberal activist allies are desperate to protect their ability to use the discredited ‘disparate impact’ legal standard in lawsuits in order to shakedown businesses and reward allies.”
      Read more about , ,
      at
      Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)