Saturday, November 4, 2017

SharonexposingDFL_ColemansComplicityCourtsCityTomPerezChairDFL

Ruling Cases re Judicial www.judicialwatch.org https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/hud-sued-for-records-of-obama-administration-involvement-in-controversial-st-paul-mn-housing-discrimination-case/

4Nov2017

THURS.2NOV.2017 Complaints under Construction

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/10/tom-perez-dnc-shake-up

QUESTIONS

Are Judgships given re Criminal Case Fixing ?

ReformTomPerez Has Tom Perez former Asst. US Attorney, Hud Commissioner when Case Fixing took place re USSC 10-1032 titled Magner vs. Gallagher.

sachamber Fred Melo July 2015

Landlord lawsuit over St. Paul’s inspections doesn’t name city defendant – Twi

At Issue former City Attorney Sara Grewing now Judge 2nd Judicial District

David Lillhaug now Justice MN Supreme Court.?

Has Candidate VA Widow Sharon Anderson aka In re Scarrella4Justice221Nw2ND562 been exclused from St. Paul Mayoral Debates because Sharon is a Loyal Donald Trump Supporter ?

contrary to NonProfits Tax Exempt Status Title 26 501c3

TO the Above Named Specifically Mayor Chris Coleman, City Attorney Samuel Clark, City Council Enbanc2017.

2007EDemCouncil Ruling Answers/Objections 2007 tp 2017

sachamber

Click here: https://scannedretina.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/213400743-sharonanderson-appeal-670295mnappeal149632.pdf

Sharon Anderson
What qualifies you to hold this position? Trust Worthy, Honest, High Morals Whistleblower
What would your top priorities be if elected? DownSize, Audit all Depts, Eliminate Duplication Elect Police Chief, City Attorneys, Expose RealEstate Disparities.
What do you think is the primary role of government? Tax all including NonProfits, Colleges MNArtX Cooperate with President Donald Trump Business Genius. Eliminate Disparities in RealEstate.
Website or contact: www.sharon4mayor2018.blogspot.com

https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/11/04/memo-reveals-details-of-hillary-clinton-dnc-deal/23266625/

doing what i can, Tom Perez is the issue now to bring down

Coleman4Governor Case Fixing is Criminal Offense

You and your lawyer did more for Blacks, Fair Housing and for me

Hopefully my health and Blindness will get me to July for Filings www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com Have a great Thanksgiving, Holidays

ReformTomPerez

CC: todd.d.axtell@ci.stpaul.mn.us, john.choi@co.ramsey.mn.us, tvezner@pioneerpress.com
Sent: 11/3/2017 12:07:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Constutional Challenge File J1803E AssNO188302ExcessiveConsumption1Nov2017

In a message dated 10/28/2017 3:15:11 P.M. Central Daylight Time, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com writes:

Click here: Saint Paul, Minnesota | The most livable city in America

                        IN THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

                             WED.1NOV2017

                     AFFIANT VA WIDOW-MAYORAL CANDIDATE

                     MRS. SHARON ANDERSON www.sharon4mayor2018.blogspot.com

                          Supporting 2007 Blog Nothing has 2007EDemCouncil changed in 10 years.   Continued patterned enterprise by the city to take sharons propertys without just compensations,causing major stress, poverty,ptsd.

                             Gives legal notice to remove 24 page document listed below re Excessive Consumption, billings without Testimony or Canons of Construction of any DSI Inspectors, supporting Frank Steinhauser sachamber

approx 10 propertys pr page. to City or County Attorneys. and or State AG.

                             COUNT I Illegal Solicitation

https://definitions.uslegal.com/s/solicitation/

Acting United States Attorney Gregory G. Brooker https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/district-minnesota

https://www.facebook.com/usaomn



                             Sharon Owner of 697 Surrey Ave. St. Paul,MN 55106

is on page 21, with Bruce Engxxxx RealEstate and Assessments Manager

for illegal billings June 22 to Juloy 21,2017. total for 1 month is $16,099.00

                          stating Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatements

Se pg 21 and who is Real Estate and Assessments Manager Bruce Englebrelat (sp) https://www.stpaul.gov/departments/financial-services

                            No Valid Complaints, No Valid Inspections and No Work Sheet of Named Inspectors,

RES 17-1681 1 4 Excessive or Abatement Service June 22 to July 21, 2017 Resolution Approving the City’s cost of providing Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during June 22 to July 21, 2017, and setting date of Legislative Hearing for December 5, 2017 and City Council public hearing for January 17, 2018 to consider and levy the assessments against individual properties. (File No. J1803E, Assessment No. 188302)

#: RES 17-1681    Version: 1 Name: Excessive or Abatement Service June 22 to July 21, 2017

Type: Resolution Status: Agenda Ready

In control: City Council

Final action:

Title: Approving the City’s cost of providing Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during June 22 to July 21, 2017, and setting date of Legislative Hearing for December 5, 2017 and City Council public hearing for January 17, 2018 to consider and levy the assessments against individual properties. (File No. J1803E, Assessment No. 188302)

Sponsors: Russ Stark

Attachments:
1. Report of Completion, 2. Assessment Roll

MEMORANDUM OF DEFAULT JUDGMENTS

City St.Paul_Ponzi Principal ...

citystpaul-ponzi-principal.blogspot.com/.../constitutionalityrowexcessiveconsumptio.h...

Nov 28, 2016 - City St. Paul County Ramsey have for years stolen Homestead Property ... Chris Samuels Auditor,Ponzi Taxing Schemes ... Tax Payment Information ... J1703E, Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 06/23/16-08/12/16 ...

COUNT II UNFAIR CAMPAIGN MS 211b.07

Sharon Anderson - East Metro Voter Guide

www.eastmetrovoterguide.com/sharon-anderson.html

MS 211b.07 undue influence on Voters, Taxpayers, Homeowners et al. Forensic Fileswww.sharon4anderson.org. EX1 AFFIDAVIT OF CANDIDACY $500 ...

www.freedom-4you.blogspot.com Freddies Fingers MS211B.07 using ...

https://plus.google.com/101357611930702934024/posts/aVcVNeMhKoo

Sharon Anderson
Oct 15, 2017 - www.freedom-4you.blogspot.com Freddies Fingers MS211B.07 using Undue Influence to m

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME

EXCEPT CHALLENGE TO RANK VOTING MUST BE MADE.

http://citystpaul-ponzi-principal.blogspot.com/
www.sharon4mayor2018.blogspot.com
https://plus.google.com/101357611930702934024
http://www.eastmetrovoterguide.com/sharon-anderson.htmlNOTICE: This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521. This E-mail is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it.

HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration ... - Judicial Watch

https://www.judicialwatch.org/.../hud-sued-for-records-of-obama-administration-invol...

Nov 13, 2012 - The disparate impact case arose from a lawsuit by a St. Paul ... by the landlords who had won at the state level or 2) be eviscerated entirely.

Judicial Watch takes DOJ to court on government's settlement gifts to ...

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/judicial-watch-takes-doj-to...to.../135102

Nov 9, 2010 - Judicial Watch's FOIAs were sparked by two cases in which the ... The landlord denied the charges, but entered into a settlement with an ...

Magner vs. Gallagher - Blogs

blogs.twincities.com/cityhallscoop/tag/magner-vs-gallagher/

Feb 13, 2012 - Gallagher; Comments Off on JudicialWatch.org is on the case — St. ... Gallagher, a high-profile federal lawsuit filed by a group of landlords ...

Saturday, October 21, 2017

Congressional Testimony: Sharon Anderson to Bill Windsor of Lawless Ame...

Sunday, April 16, 2017

ConstitutionalityMNCommittmentJudgeKarenAsphaug-JonHoffman

Click here: Dede Evavold | Red Herring Alert

Easter Sun 16Apr2017

To the Above Named

Affiant VA Widow Mrs. Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella

is duly concerned.

WAS ALICE KRENGEL AND MARYJANE DUCHENE COVERTLY

MURDERED?

HAVE THE COURTS CREATED DEATH,DISABILITYS,DISPARAGMENT OF TITLES BY BOGUS PSCY EVALUATIONS ON PETTY/MISDEMEANOR TICKETS,

Note to Kyle Christopherson to send the Current and newly appointed Members of Commitment Panel.

Has the State Judges ie Jon Hoffman and Karen Asphaug Exceeded their Jurisdiction/Authority

CommittmentPanel2016

In the Matters of Ordering Pscy Eval , specifically on Bill Dahn on a 2 yr old Ticket, that should have been dismissed immnediately based on the Law. www.billdahn.blogspot.com

To Order a Pscy Eval on a Petty or Misdemeanor Ticket 2 yrs old is Bizzare.

https://redherringalert.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/final-evaluation.jpg?w=869

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME

Re ParensPatrie Duty of MN AG must intervent in all Commitment and or Psyc Evaluations.

www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com Forensic Files www.sharon4anderson.org

www.sharon4mayor2018.blogspot.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson Homestead Act of 1862 neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are makinknowledge gained as financial journalists , securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in g such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw Sharons

www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com

www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
_
http://www.blogger.com/profile/17187848282847569592

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"

including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See:
Quon
v. Arch.

Friday, February 10, 2017

9th Circuit Upholds District Court's Block of Trump's Immigration Order - CourtSide

Thursday, February 9, 2017

TrumpsOrderImmigration

About time Court Authority/Jurisdiction is challenged We Love Donald Trump Great Businessman who is not a Lying Lawyer.

https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/ed_va_state_amicus_as_filed.pdf

17 Attorneys General File Amicus Brief In Support Of Virginia’s Lawsuit Against President Trump’s Immigration Ban

New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, And Massachusetts Lead Coalition Of AGs In Support Of A Preliminary Injunction Enjoining The Executive Order Nationwide

Amicus Brief Builds On Another Brief Filed Earlier This Week In 9^th Circuit, As Well As Other Legal Action By State Attorneys General –Including The Lawsuit Filed By NY AG Schneiderman In The Eastern District Of NY Last Week

Today, 17 Attorneys General filed an amicus brief in support of the Commonwealth of Virginia’s lawsuit against the Trump Administration’s executive order on immigration. This follows an amicus brief filed earlier this week with the U.S. 9^th Circuit Court of Appeals, supporting the Washington State lawsuit against the executive order.

The amicus brief is led by the Attorneys General from New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania, and also signed by the Attorneys General from California, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Delaware, Iowa, Maryland, Maine, North Carolina, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. In the amici curiae brief filed today in the Virginia suit, the Attorneys General stated: “The excluded individuals include those with valid U.S. visas that enable them to work, study, and travel within the amici States. The Executive Order thus inhibits the free exchange of information, ideas, and talent between the seven designated countries and the amici States, negatively affecting the financial stability and intellectual vitality of educational and research institutions, and disrupting large and small businesses throughout the States.”

The full amicus brief is available here.

State Attorneys General have been at the forefront of the opposition to President Trump’s order. In addition to the amicus briefs filed this week, New York Attorney General Schneiderman filed to join the lawsuit in the Eastern District of New York last week.

“As Attorneys General, our primary job is to protect the people we represent,” said New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman. “President Trump’s immigration ban represents an all-out assault on the rights of New Yorkers, on our economy and businesses, and on our educational and healthcare institutions. My fellow Attorneys General and I will continue to do everything in our power to strike down this unconstitutional, discriminatory, and chaotic order, and prevent further harm to the people we serve.”

“Choosing who is allowed to come to our country based on their religious beliefs is unconstitutional and discriminatory,” Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said. “As the chief legal officer for one of the most diverse states in the nation, I am committed to protecting all of the residents of Illinois and our educational institutions and employers from the harm caused by this executive action.”

“I am supporting Virginia’s lawsuit because no president is more powerful than our Constitution. As state attorneys general, it is our job to hold this administration accountable and stand for the interests of our states and our residents. Working together, we are united in this nationwide effort," said Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey.

“This filing is about keeping our communities safe, protecting our economy, and upholding the rule of law,” Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro said. “Pennsylvania was founded on the promise of liberty and we’re proud to help lead this effort in support of Virginia’s lawsuit.”

“We strongly believe this executive order violates both core constitutional principles and federal law, and we are proud to join with our fellow states in opposing its implementation in this case as well as the 9^th Circuit case,” District of Columbia Attorney General Karl A. Racine said. “The District of Columbia, like all of our jurisdictions, is a city that has always thrived thanks to the hard work of immigrants and the educational and scientific resources that visitors and temporary residents from nations all over the world bring to our city every day. We will continue to fight for basic American principles of equal protection, religious freedom, and welcoming people from all nations and cultures.”

“The Trump Administration’s Executive Order is not only a policy that is unwise and dangerous, but it is a policy that is inhumane, inappropriate and un-American,” saidMaryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh. “As Attorneys General, collectively we will use our authority to protect the business community, educational institutions, and our citizens from this unconstitutional order.”

“President Trump’s executive order undermines the core American value of religious tolerance, and it makes us less safe. It signals to the world that America sees all Muslims as terrorists, strengthening ISIS’s propaganda and efforts to recruit terrorists. That is why I will join my colleagues in taking action,” said North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein.

“We will continue to review each lawsuit filed to determine how best we can, individually and collectively, stop the President’s ill-conceived, immoral, and unconstitutional executive order,” said Rhode Island Attorney General Peter F. Kilmartin. “As a state and a nation, we benefit academically, culturally and economically from the many immigrants that make up our communities. This executive order not only has a chilling effect on those communities but also on our academic institutions and our economy.”

The amicus brief highlights the irreparable harm already caused to the amici states, including disruptions to staffing and intellectual exchange at colleges, universities, and medical institutions; enduring harm to the states’ economies and tax revenues; and the irreparable injury caused by the executive order’s egregious violations of the U.S. Constitution.

In particular, the brief cites the hundreds of employees and thousands of students affected by the order at state educational institutions, as well as disruptions to medical staffing and research. Additionally, the brief highlights the large number of entrepreneurs, developers, and other professionals who are foreign-born, and on which businesses and the states’ economies rely. The order has also caused the amici states to lose both direct and indirect tax revenue; for example, the approximately 1,000 nationals from the designated countries studying in New York on temporary visas have contributed nearly $30.4 million to the State’s economy.

The brief goes on to detail how the executive order violates the Establishment, Due Process, and Equal Protection clauses of the constitution, and how the order’s chaotic implementation has gravely harmed people in the states. As the brief states, “Without judicial action staying the implementation of the Executive Order across the country, our States will see a return of the chaos experienced in our airports beginning on the weekend of January 28 and 29, and continued serious harms to the individuals who live, work, and study in our States; the institutions that employ and educate such persons; and the communities in which they reside.”

The amicus brief calls for the Court to enter a preliminary injunction enjoining the operation of the executive order on a nationwide basis.