Sharon4MNAGvMuslinKeithEllisonAGelect,must Enforce Constitutional USSC Denied Due Process,Rule of Law even when Filing Fees Paid.Free Speech Implement Medical Marijuana Immediately, Expose Judicial Corruption,Communist Lawyers www.lawlessamerica.com ExposeShariaLaw
Wednesday, July 25, 2018
Saturday, July 21, 2018
Friday, July 20, 2018
VoteSharonSemperFi4mnag,LoyaltoPresidentDonaldTrumpOffice,14Aug18Primary
Fri.20Jul2018
SILENCE IS NOT CONSENT WAKE UP AMERICA
There is a current crisis in the legal system and the Attorney General should be in the front line keeping the legal system also for the average person. As a White,VA Widow,not a Liar or Lawyer Blind in L Eye due to Medical Malpractice, unabated by Current AG
Taking our Children via Heinous Custody,Divorce,Foster Care,https://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com/2018/04/loriswansonvssharonandersonvssandragraz.html
Taking our RealEstate re USSC 10-1032 titled Magner vs. Gallagher https://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2018-04-08T11:17:00-07:00&max-results=7&reverse-paginate=true
.,Sharon will downsize the City and County Attorneys, have 10 District Attorneys under the Umbrella of the AG's Office. Business Persons aligned to our President Hon. Donald Trump. Sharon must use Provisions in the QuiTam, ParensPatrie and the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_attorney_general
Another example of the "private attorney general" provisions is the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). RICO allows average citizens (private attorneys general) to sue those organizations that commit mail and wire fraud as part of their criminal enterprise.[citation needed] To date, there are over 60 federal statutes[citation needed] that encourage private enforcement by allowing prevailing plaintiffs to collect attorney's fees.
Sharon Denied the Job of Judge In re Scarrella4Justice221N2d562 Published illegally by State Supreme Court , without Royaltys, stated Learned in Law means a License, In our High Tech Age Sharon will not Defend Judges who act in Bad Behavior http://www.mncourts.gov/Clerk-of-Appellate-Courts/Supreme-Court-Appeal-Panel.aspx
Sharon must Lobby to Abolish the State Committment Panel appointed by Chief Justice Lori Gilda knowing certain Judges have been sued. http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com can empathize and understand the needs of the average citizen and make sure the Office of the Attorney General shows equal care and empaty.
Panel One - Judge Asphaug
Panel Two - Judge Rancourt
Panel Three – Judge Higgs
hy. using the Parens Patrie
b. The state, as parens patriae suing to prevent invasion of privacy by credit-card issuer and collector, vindicates a public interest even when it seeks victim-specific relief and is not bound by the arbitration clause contained in victims’ credit
Parens patriae - Wikipedia
Parens patriae is Latin for "parent of the nation In law, it refers to the public policy power of the ... Theconcept of the parens patriae suit has been greatly
-card contracts.
c.
Enough is enough when it comes to the injustices of the past 40 years. Top three policy issues
: 1. Stop Minnesota
- Qui tam, an analogous concept
- Parens patriae, a roughly opposite concept
2. Stop fraud and illegal practices by corporations and government that harm the ordinary citizen. http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
unabated by Current DFL AG
3. Prosecute fraud, misconduct and other criminal conduct by public official and corporations. Role as consumer protection advocate: The Office of the Attorney General must protect the public safety and welfare, and additionally protect the public from corruption and fraud by government officials and bureaucracy https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/hud-sued-for-records-of-obama-administration-involvement-in-controversial-st-paul-mn-housing-discrimination-case/
Please note City St. Paul Chris Coleman now CEO Habitat Humanity, David Lillhaug,Sara Grewing appointed to Justice and Judge their Crimes unabated by Current AG Lori Swanson, current Gov Candidate.
Judicial Watch separately obtained documentsunder the Minnesota Data Practices Act, showing that St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing arranged a meeting between the chief of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before the city’s withdrawal from the case, captioned Magner v. Gallagher. Following Perez’s visit, the city withdrew its case and thanked DOJ and officials at HUD for their involvement.
On April 4, Judicial Watch sent a FOIA request to the DOJ and HUD seeking access to the following:
a. Further there must be a focus on prosecuting crimes that are covered up by local city and county attorneys to keep these local officials accountable. Priorities of responsibility to state governments, local governments and individuals: The first and foremost responsibility is to the individual citizens of Minnesota.
City and County governments are subdivisions of the state government, however, these entities, often corporations, should not receive special protection and should not receive legal representation in cases where there is questionable conduct, discrimination, prejudice, abuse of power, or other similar abuse of public office, by any state and local officials. These entities and persons should be responsible for paying for and obtaining their own legal counsel.
John Gentry I like these sections from your link... Very well stated. We no longer have a representative government, a rule of law, or justice.
Liberty has fallen to legalism.
Freedom has fallen to fascism.
Justice has become jaded, jaundiced and just plain unjust.
And for too many, the American dream of freedom and opportunity has turned into a living nightmare. As a result, the police and other government agents have been generally empowered to probe, poke, pinch, taser, search, seize, strip and generally manhandle anyone they see fit in almost any circumstance, all with the general blessing of the courts.
Rarely do the concerns of the populace prevail.
When presented with an opportunity to loosen the government’s noose that keeps getting cinched tighter and tighter around the necks of the American people, what does our current Supreme Court usually do?
It ducks.
Prevaricates.
Remains silent.
Speaks to the narrowest possible concern.
More often than not, it gives the government and its corporate sponsors the benefit of the doubt, which leaves “we the people” hanging by a thread.
Liberty has fallen to legalism.
Freedom has fallen to fascism.
Justice has become jaded, jaundiced and just plain unjust.
And for too many, the American dream of freedom and opportunity has turned into a living nightmare. As a result, the police and other government agents have been generally empowered to probe, poke, pinch, taser, search, seize, strip and generally manhandle anyone they see fit in almost any circumstance, all with the general blessing of the courts.
Rarely do the concerns of the populace prevail.
When presented with an opportunity to loosen the government’s noose that keeps getting cinched tighter and tighter around the necks of the American people, what does our current Supreme Court usually do?
It ducks.
Prevaricates.
Remains silent.
Speaks to the narrowest possible concern.
More often than not, it gives the government and its corporate sponsors the benefit of the doubt, which leaves “we the people” hanging by a thread.
4
Sharons SemperFi Loyality to President Donald Trump and the Office
Current Candidate MNAG LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: HEALTHCARE
http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com
http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdf
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogsbd pot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4andersonHomestead Act of 1862| ScriDocument's are based on SEC filings,| www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson
1 Attached Images
Monday, July 16, 2018
SharonSemperFiCandidateMNAG WCCOresponse2018
Apparantly Ajmay@wcco.com called a few min ago
Attorney General Perez Obstructs Justice? | Scanned Retina – A Resource for the People!
MEDIA COVERUP
Resubmitted 612-330-2509 Apology if in duplicate
Affiant VA Widow Whistleblower is sick and tired of DFL Corruption Tom Perez and Keith Ellison current DFL Chair and Co Chair complicit to have USSC 10-1032 TITLED Magner vs. Gallagher withdrawn
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa , House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte and Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Chuck Grassley released a joint staff report “Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Quid Pro Quo with St. Paul: How Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez Manipulated Justice and Ignored the Rule of Law”. The report details how DOJ’s civil rights division chief Thomas Perez made a secret deal with the City of St. Paul that ultimately prevented the Justice Department from recovering up to $200 million for taxpayers.
- The Department of Justice entered into a quid pro quo arrangement with the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, in which the Department agreed to drop two cases — United States ex rel. Newell v. City of St. Paul and United States ex rel. Ellis v. City of St. Paul et al. — in exchange for the City withdrawing Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court.
- In declining to intervene in a whistleblower complaint as part of the quid pro quo with the City of St. Paul, the Department of Justice gave up the opportunity to recover as much as $200 million.
- The initial development of the quid pro quo by senior political appointees, and the subsequent 180 degree change of position, confused and frustrated the career Department of Justice attorneys responsible for enforcing the False Claims Act, who described the situation as “weirdness,” “ridiculous,” and a case of “cover your head ping pong.”
- The “consensus” of the federal government to switch its recommendation and decline intervention in Newell was the direct result of Assistant Attorney General Perez manipulating the process and advising and overseeing the communications between the City of St. Paul, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the Civil Division within the Department of Justice.
- Assistant Attorney General Perez attempted to cover up the quid pro quo when he personally instructed career attorneys to omit a discussion of Magner in the declination memos that outlined the reasons for the Department’s decision to decline intervention in Newell and Ellis, and focus instead only “on the merits.”
- Assistant Attorney General Perez attempted to cover up the quid pro quo when he insisted that the final deal with the City settling two cases worth potentially millions of dollars to the Treasury not be reduced to writing, instead insisting that your “word was your bond.”
 |
| Add caption |
- Assistant Attorney General Perez made multiple statements to the Committees that contradicted testimony from other witnesses and documentary evidence.
- The ethics and professional responsibility opinions obtained by Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez and his staff were narrowly focused on his personal and financial interests in a deal and his authority to speak on behalf of the Civil Division, and thus do not address the quid pro quo itself or Perez’s particular actions in effectuating the quid pro quo.
- The Justice Department marginalized a whistleblower and reduced him to a “bargaining chip” in his own words to advance their agenda.
Key Findings:
Sat. 14Jul2018Sharons Response to WCCO-TV Realty CheckSharons Semper Fi uses Google, Social Media, facebook,twitter etc.Has over 100 Blogs with Forensic FilesHorrors of Sharia Law
WCCO-TV IS HELPING VOTERS GET TO KNOW YOU BY LAUNCHING A DIGITAL CANDIDATE GUIDE.
Horrors of Sharia LawHer Horrors of Sharia Law e's how you can part of it: Shoot a video of your candidate sharing how he/she will make a difference, include campaign priorities etc. Video should run 2 min or less Format mp4 or mov Send the video to ajmay@wcco.com Deadline: July 18th Amy Please edit the Video below for TimeSharon is duly concerned re Muslin Takeove USA re https://www.sbs.com.au/news/explainer-what-is-sharia-lawContrary to State and Federal Constitutions, ChristriantySharon Anderson to Bill Windsor of Lawless America - YouTube
Dec 17, 2012 - Uploaded by lawlessamericaCongressional Testimony: Sharon Anderson to Bill Windsor of Lawless America. This is unedited video ...Beyond the video, WCCO viewers have questions.We've compiled a few of them below for you to answer.Please review and send your responses along with your video.Again, the deadline is July 18th!Have questions? Email ajmay@wcco.com or call 612-330-2509.Again, the deadline is July 18th! Have questions? Email ajmay@wcco.com or call 612-330-2509. Questions For Candidate:
1.) Should Minnesota cities be allowed to declare themselves "sanctuary cities" and decline to cooperate with federal officials to enforce immigration laws?No MN is as Nanny State, over lawed, overlawyered. Agree with our President Donald Trump, cut the Funding. Affiant must overhaul AG;s Office, apparantly with 130 lawyers bumping into each other,State Constitution does not State AG's Office only Represents the State and Agencys, Consumer Affairs must address the individual concerns re Horrors of Sandra Grazzini Rucki https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjmpJLKbCogAffiants Passion vs. Attorneys General started years ago when Warren Spannus involved in the Takings of my Daughter Vonessa, giving to her Father and his Mistress at that time involved in the Murder of 10 month old Baby Boy Henry Gooselaw Jr.We do not need all these City and County Attorneys.Have 10 District Attorneys under the Umbrella of AG's Office,When Judges or any Public Official are sued, they must hire their own lawyer or Go Pro Se.
Further the ParensPatrie http://stmedia.startribune.com/documents/Attorney+general's+complaint.pdf
2.) There is an an effort by state attorneys general to sue pharmaceutical companies for their role in helping create the opioid crisis in America and Minnesota. Will you support those efforts by filing a lawsuit on behalf of Minnesota? Swanson already hasThese law suits are Cash Cows for Lawyers, exploiting Vunerable Adults, Sharons 2nd husband Silver Star Marine with PTSD Alcohol its not the Companys but the undue influence, will read and track thro the Courts.
3.) Should the penalty for certain violent crimes in Minnesota be the death penalty? Yes only On a Case by Case Basis, Affiant is duly concerned that True Muslin Candidates in USA owe their Alligence to the Quoran, re Shariaand not to the Soverign Citizens Homegrown.use Beheading for Death Penaltys
4.) Should Minnesota release non-violent drug offenders currently serving Minnesota prison terms? Yes Affiant must Lobby to Abolish Committment Courts
Administrative order - membership.2018 by@Sharon4Anderson#committments#courtshttps://www.slideshare.net/SharonAnderson4/administrative-order-membership2018 … via@SlideShare
Do not reply to this email.MINNESOTA
OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
COMPLAINT FORMComplainant Name, Address and Phone NumbersComplainant 1:
Mrs. Sharon L Anderson697 Surrey AveSt.Paul, MN 55106Email: sharon4anderson@aol.comHome Phone: (651) 776-5835Respondent Name, Address and Phone NumberKeith Ellison1312 Broadwalk AveMpls, MN 55411Phone: (962) 529-6933Additional InformationRelationship to Lawyer: OtherIf you are someone other than the client, what is your connection to the lawyer?Complaint:Techinally Keith, Muslin since age 19 is using his Congressional Office and Candidate Office of AG to Act at War with President Donald Trump, and the Office of President of USA. contrary to Separation of Powers Doctrine. In Affiants Humble Opinion Keith is inciting Violence, committing Treason using his Lawyers License, also did Swanson and Keith acting with Perez using DFL TO DESTROY ENDORSEMENTS for their pecuniary gain?
http://alphanewsmn.com/keith-ellison-ethics-complaint-minnesota-media-blackout/
DFL CANDIDATES FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL DEBATE:
https://www.tpt.org/almanac/video/dfl-candidates-for-attorney-general-debate-31087/
Keiths Testimony he will not give up V DFL Chair, apparantly Complicit with Chair Tom Perez to Committ Fraud,Bribery, on the State of MN and USSC-10-1032 Titled Magner vs. Gallagher http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal
behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s
outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining
intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell
against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in
exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the
Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair
Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the
Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling
disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow
the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led< br />him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City.
Fredrick Newell, a minister and small-business owner in St. Paul, had spent almost a
decade working to improve economic opportunities for low-income residents in his community.
In 2009, Newell filed a whistleblower lawsuit alleging that the City of St. Paul had received tens
of millions of dollars of community development funds, including stimulus funding, by
improperly certifying its compliance with federal law. By November 2011, Newell had spent
over two years discussing his case with career attorneys in the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota, and the Civil Fraud Section within the
Justice Department’s Civil Division. These three entities, which had each invested a substantial
amount of time and resources into Newell’s case, regarded this as a strong case potentially worth
as much as $200 million for taxpayers and recommended that the federal government join the
suit. These career attorneys even went so far as to prepare a formal memorandum
recommending intervention, calling St. Paul’s actions a “particularly egregious example of false
certifications.”
All this work was for naught. In late November 2011, Lillehaug made PerezAre you submitting documents with this complaint? NoDocuments submitted by mail must be received within 7 days to be considered part of the complaint. If this Office does not receive accompanying documents, your complaint may be considered based solely on the information contained in this complaint form.Dated: 7/9/2018Additional information and documents must be mailed to:Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility
1500 Landmark Towers
345 St. Peter Street
St. Paul, MN 55102
651-296-3952
1-800-657-3601Current Candidate MNAG LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: HEALTHCARE
http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com
http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdf
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogsbd pot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4andersonHomestead Act of 1862| ScriDocument's are based on SEC filings,| www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson
Friday, July 13, 2018
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)