SharonsFacebookVideo

Post by Sharon Anderson.

Monday, July 16, 2018

SharonSemperFiCandidateMNAG WCCOresponse2018

                     Apparantly Ajmay@wcco.com called a few min ago

Attorney General Perez Obstructs Justice? | Scanned Retina – A Resource for the People!

                           MEDIA COVERUP


Resubmitted 612-330-2509   Apology if in duplicate
                Affiant VA Widow Whistleblower is sick and tired of DFL Corruption Tom Perez and Keith Ellison current DFL Chair and Co Chair complicit to have USSC 10-1032 TITLED Magner vs. Gallagher withdrawn

            House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa , House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte and Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Chuck Grassley released a joint staff report “Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Quid Pro Quo with St. Paul: How Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez Manipulated Justice and Ignored the Rule of Law”. The report details how DOJ’s civil rights division chief Thomas Perez made a secret deal  with the City of St. Paul that ultimately prevented the Justice Department from recovering up to $200 million for taxpayers.
  • The Department of Justice entered into a quid pro quo arrangement with the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, in which the Department agreed to drop two cases — United States ex rel. Newell v. City of St. Paul and United States ex rel. Ellis v. City of St. Paul et al. — in exchange for the City withdrawing Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court.
  • In declining to intervene in a whistleblower complaint as part of the quid pro quo with the City of St. Paul, the Department of Justice gave up the opportunity to recover as much as $200 million.
  • The initial development of the quid pro quo by senior political appointees, and the subsequent 180 degree change of position, confused and frustrated the career Department of Justice attorneys responsible for enforcing the False Claims Act, who described the situation as “weirdness,” “ridiculous,” and a case of “cover your head ping pong.”
  • The “consensus” of the federal government to switch its recommendation and decline intervention in Newell was the direct result of Assistant Attorney General Perez manipulating the process and advising and overseeing the communications between the City of St. Paul, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the Civil Division within the Department of Justice.
  • Assistant Attorney General Perez attempted to cover up the quid pro quo when he personally instructed career attorneys to omit a discussion of Magner in the declination memos that outlined the reasons for the Department’s decision to decline intervention in Newell and Ellis, and focus instead only “on the merits.”
    Add caption
  • Assistant Attorney General Perez attempted to cover up the quid pro quo when he insisted that the final deal with the City settling two cases worth potentially millions of dollars to the Treasury not be reduced to writing, instead insisting that your “word was your bond.”
  • Assistant Attorney General Perez made multiple statements to the Committees that contradicted testimony from other witnesses and documentary evidence.
  • The ethics and professional responsibility opinions obtained by Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez and his staff were narrowly focused on his personal and financial interests in a deal and his authority to speak on behalf of the Civil Division, and thus do not address the quid pro quo itself or Perez’s particular actions in effectuating the quid pro quo.
  • The Justice Department marginalized a whistleblower and reduced him to a “bargaining chip” in his own words to advance their agenda.

Key Findings:
       

In a message dated 7/14/2018 5:09:01 AM Central Standard Time, sharon4anderson@aol.com writes:

                    Sat. 14Jul2018
               Sharons Response to WCCO-TV  Realty Check
        Sharons Semper Fi uses Google, Social Media, facebook,twitter etc.
                Has over 100 Blogs with Forensic Files
     Horrors of Sharia Law 


WCCO-TV IS HELPING VOTERS GET TO KNOW YOU BY LAUNCHING A DIGITAL CANDIDATE GUIDE.
   Horrors of Sharia Law  
Her   Horrors of Sharia Law  e's how you can part of it:
 Shoot a video of your candidate sharing how he/she will make a difference, include campaign priorities etc.
 Video should run 2 min or less
 Format mp4 or mov
 Send the video to ajmay@wcco.com
 Deadline: July 18th   Amy Please edit the Video below for Time
                           Sharon is duly concerned re Muslin Takeove USA re https://www.sbs.com.au/news/explainer-what-is-sharia-law
                          Contrary to State and Federal Constitutions, Christrianty

Sharon Anderson to Bill Windsor of Lawless America - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TbcTC5Yg68

Dec 17, 2012 - Uploaded by lawlessamerica
Congressional Testimony: Sharon Anderson to Bill Windsor of Lawless America. This is unedited video ...
Beyond the video, WCCO viewers have questions.
We've compiled a few of them below for you to answer.
Please review and send your responses along with your video.
Again, the deadline is July 18th!
Have questions? Email ajmay@wcco.com or call 612-330-2509.

 Again, the deadline is July 18th! Have questions? Email ajmay@wcco.com or call 612-330-2509. Questions For Candidate:
1.) Should Minnesota cities be allowed to declare themselves "sanctuary cities" and decline to cooperate with federal officials to enforce immigration laws?
                   No  MN is as Nanny State, over lawed, overlawyered. Agree with our President Donald Trump, cut the Funding. Affiant must overhaul AG;s Office, apparantly with 130 lawyers bumping into each other,
                    State Constitution does not State AG's Office only Represents the State and Agencys, Consumer Affairs must address the individual concerns re Horrors of Sandra Grazzini Rucki https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjmpJLKbCog
                     Affiants Passion vs. Attorneys General started years ago when Warren Spannus involved in the Takings of my Daughter Vonessa, giving to her Father and his Mistress at that time involved in the Murder of 10 month old Baby Boy Henry Gooselaw Jr.

We do not need all these City and County Attorneys.
                    Have 10 District Attorneys under the Umbrella of AG's Office,
When Judges or any Public Official are sued, they must hire their own lawyer or Go Pro Se.

Sandra "Sam" Grazzini-Rucki describes a life on the run, courts ignoring sexual abuse, attempted murder, and other crimes at the hands of her husband, David Rucki. These crimes are allowed to happen largely due to a ring of judges, cops, and lawyers in Dakota County,
                   Further the ParensPatrie http://stmedia.startribune.com/documents/Attorney+general's+complaint.pdf


2.) There is an an effort by state attorneys general to sue pharmaceutical companies for their role in helping create the opioid crisis in America and Minnesota. Will you support those efforts by filing a lawsuit on behalf of Minnesota?  Swanson already has

These law suits are Cash Cows for Lawyers, exploiting Vunerable Adults, Sharons 2nd husband Silver Star Marine with PTSD Alcohol its not the Companys but the undue influence,  will read and track thro the Courts.


3.) Should the penalty for certain violent crimes in Minnesota be the death penalty? Yes only  On a Case by Case Basis, Affiant is duly concerned that True Muslin Candidates in USA owe their Alligence to the Quoran, re Sharia
and not to the Soverign Citizens Homegrown.
                   use Beheading for Death Penaltys

4.) Should Minnesota release non-violent drug offenders currently serving Minnesota prison terms?  Yes  Affiant must Lobby to Abolish Committment Courts 

More
Administrative order - membership.2018 by Sharon4Anderson committments courtshttps://www.slideshare.net/SharonAnderson… via SlideShare

1:18 PM - 13 Jul 2018


Do not reply to this email.
MINNESOTA
OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
COMPLAINT FORM
Complainant Name, Address and Phone Numbers
Complainant 1:
Mrs. Sharon L Anderson
697 Surrey Ave
St.Paul, MN 55106
Home Phone: (651) 776-5835
Respondent Name, Address and Phone Number
Keith Ellison
1312 Broadwalk Ave
Mpls, MN 55411
Phone: (962) 529-6933
Additional Information
Relationship to Lawyer: Other
If you are someone other than the client, what is your connection to the lawyer?
Complaint:
Techinally Keith, Muslin since age 19 is using his Congressional Office and Candidate Office of AG to Act at War with President Donald Trump, and the Office of President of USA. contrary to Separation of Powers Doctrine. In Affiants Humble Opinion Keith is inciting Violence, committing Treason using his Lawyers License, also did Swanson and Keith acting with Perez using DFL TO DESTROY ENDORSEMENTS for their pecuniary gain?

http://alphanewsmn.com/keith-ellison-ethics-complaint-minnesota-media-blackout/

DFL CANDIDATES FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL DEBATE:

https://www.tpt.org/almanac/video/dfl-candidates-for-attorney-general-debate-31087/
Keiths Testimony he will not give up V DFL Chair, apparantly Complicit with Chair Tom Perez to Committ Fraud,Bribery, on the State of MN and USSC-10-1032 Titled Magner vs. Gallagher http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal
behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s
outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining
intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell
against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in
exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the
Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair
Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the
Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling
disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow
the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led< br />him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City.
Fredrick Newell, a minister and small-business owner in St. Paul, had spent almost a
decade working to improve economic opportunities for low-income residents in his community.
In 2009, Newell filed a whistleblower lawsuit alleging that the City of St. Paul had received tens
of millions of dollars of community development funds, including stimulus funding, by
improperly certifying its compliance with federal law. By November 2011, Newell had spent
over two years discussing his case with career attorneys in the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota, and the Civil Fraud Section within the
Justice Department’s Civil Division. These three entities, which had each invested a substantial
amount of time and resources into Newell’s case, regarded this as a strong case potentially worth
as much as $200 million for taxpayers and recommended that the federal government join the
suit. These career attorneys even went so far as to prepare a formal memorandum
recommending intervention, calling St. Paul’s actions a “particularly egregious example of false
certifications.”
All this work was for naught. In late November 2011, Lillehaug made Perez
Are you submitting documents with this complaint?   No
Documents submitted by mail must be received within 7 days to be considered part of the complaint. If this Office does not receive accompanying documents, your complaint may be considered based solely on the information contained in this complaint form.
Dated:  7/9/2018
Additional information and documents must be mailed to:
Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility
1500 Landmark Towers
345 St. Peter Street
St. Paul, MN 55102
651-296-3952
1-800-657-3601
at