WE THE PEOPLE HAS MNAG MUSLIN KEITH ELLISON USED
THE QUORAN TO SUBVERT USA CONSTITUTION?
Home | The Office of Attorney General Keith Ellison AFFIANT Mrs.Sharon Anderson aka Scarrells re Penalty of Perjury :
2017 Michael Davis dismissed USSC 10-1032 - Google Searchdge Michael Davis, When Davis arbitrarily dismissed USSC 10-1032
Michael J. Davis - Wikipedia
Case Filed: | May 05, 2004 |
Re-opened: | Nov 30, 2010Terminated2017 |
: | President Trump Clashes with Legal Oversight in Three Cases to be Argued at the Supreme Court 40 mins ago |
Magner v. Gallagher
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10-1032 | 8th Cir. | Not Argued | Feb 14, 2012 | N/A | N/A | OT 2011 |
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own, but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?
Judgment: Dismissed - Rule 14 on February 14, 2012.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Fair housing case dismissed (Lyle Denniston, February 10, 2012)
- Petition of the day (Conor McEvily, May 20, 2011)
Briefs and Documents
Merits Briefs for the Petitioners
Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners
- Brief of the International Municipal Lawyers Association et al.
- Brief of the Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey
- Brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation et al.
- Brief of the Independent Community Bankers of America et al.
- Brief of the Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc.
- Brief of the American Bankers Association et al.
Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party
Merits Briefs for the Respondents
Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
In a message dated 2/5/2022 8:33:48 AM Central Standard Time, sharon4anderson@aol.com writes: