RICOComplaintSt.PaulPoliceChiefTodd.d.Axtell

                                 Mon.20Nov2017

                      Legal Notice Affiant is Constructing a RICO/civil/criminal complaint

       Have a great Thanksgiving We all have a lot to be thankful for Silence is  Consent   

                    ISSUES OF UNFAIR ELECTIONS BY EXCLUDING SHARON and others from certain Video Debates from Non Profits is cause to investigate their Title 26 501c3 Tax Exemptions Status.

                        Further City St. Paul,MN has for years taken Sharons Car with disabled plates, turned off her water, stolen trailer, personal property in a Rico Patterned Enterprise for decades.
Why not 10 St. Paul mayors? Let’s seek the wisdom of them all – Twin Cities

                        Years ago forced use of and Depakote to harm injure Sharon.
Tramadol: The most dangerous drug in the world – GREAT AMERICANS

                          CONSUTIONALITY OF EXCESSIVE CONSUMPTION UNABATED BY CITY,COUNTY AND STATE OFFICIALS  www.sharon4anderson.or

                           SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE

 Penalties for Violations of State Ethics and Public Corruption Laws

      To St. Paul Police Chief Todd.d.Axtell and all others as their Interest appear.         Affiant VA Widow
Answer/Cross/1/2MillionClaim v.CitySt.Paul

Mrs. Sharon Anderson QuiTam Relator

                        Following State and Federal Laws re Election and Realest
ReformTomPerez  ate Case Fixing    

             STATE OF MINNESOTA by and through St. Paul Police Chief

Todd d. Axtell et al

                           Plaintiff-Complainant

Mrs. Sharon (Peterson-Scarrella)

                          QuiTam Relator-Contestant-Legal Owner

Homestead 1058 Summit,6unit 325N.Wilder,Duplex 2194 Marshall,448 Desnoyer, 1/3rd 309 Pelham Blvd, 697 Surrey St. Paul,MN
CodeCorruption2017

                          VS.

CITY ST.PAUL,Mayor Chris Coleman,City Attorney Samuel Clark,

Executive Branch,Steve Magner,City Council Enbanc,2017
SueJeffersMN ManskyMayoral Candidates enbanc, DSI ,Ramsey Co, Joe Manskey et al http://www.eastmetrovoterguide.com/2017-saint-paul-mayoral-candidates.html

http://mncapitolnews.com/  Marty Ownings et al

https://www.mprnews.org/story/2017/11/02/st-paul-mayor-debate

Tim Nelson, Tom Weber, et al MPR

www.twincities.com Fred Melo et al

Why not 10 St. Paul mayors? Let’s seek the wisdom of them all – Twin Cities

Metro State U! Friday, Sept. 22nd, 6:00 – 9:00 p.m., Student Senate forum, Metro State Univ., Great Hall, 1st Floor student.senate@metrtostate.edu 651-793-1554 Tuesday

,, 7:00 – 8:30 p.m., Mac Dems, Macalester College, John B. Davis Lecture Hall www.freedom-4you.blogspot.com SHAME ON ROSENBERG https://www.macalester.edu/communications/ Wed., Oct. 4th, 4:00 – 6:00 p.m., HIV/AIDS Forum, Mn AIDS Project, 2577 Territorial Rd Thurs.,

Mon., Oct. 9th, 6:00 – 8:00 p.m., Downtown Forum, History Theater, 30 10th St E p.m., Eric Escola et al,

20h ago · 21 neighborhoods in General

RES 17-1832

1

6

2017 Election Canvass and Results

Resolution

Canvassing the returns and declaring the results of the City General Election held

    

File #:

RES 17-1802    Version: 1

Name:

Excessive/Abatement Service July 23 to August 18, 2017

Type:

Resolution

Status:

Passed

In control:

City Council

Final action:

11/15/2017

Title:

Approving the City’s cost of providing Excessive of Use of Inspection/Abatement services billed during July 23 to August 18, 2017, and setting date of Legislative Hearing for December 19, 2017 and City Council public hearing for February 7, 2018 to consider and levy the assessments against individual properties. (File No. J1804E, Assessment No. 188303)

Sponsors:

Russ Stark

Attachments:

1. Report of Completion, 2. Assessment Roll

              Further Affiant sayeth not at this time will firm up complaint next week

Public officer or employee, requests, receives or agrees to receive, directly or indirectly, any such benefit, reward or consideration upon the understanding that it will influence the person's performance of the powers or duties as such officer or employee (soliciting or receiving a bribe) Offering, giving, or promising  to give, directly or indirectly, to any person who is a public officer or employee any benefit, reward or consideration to which the person is not legally entitled with intent thereby to influence the person's performance of the powers or duties as such officer or employee (offering a bribe)	CC §609.42	Max. imprisonment  10 years; Max. fine $20,000; Forfeiture of office
	Intentionally refusing or omitting to pay state funds to the state or its agency or subdivision entitled thereto, or to an officer or agent authorized to receive the same (failure to pay over state funds) Public officer or employee who audits, allows, or pays any claim or demand made upon the state or subdivision thereof or other governmental instrumentality within the state which the public officer or employee knows is false or fraudulent in whole or in part(Permitting false claims against government)	CC §609.445 CC §609.455	Max. 5 years imprisonment; Max. fine $10,000
	Failure to perform functions of job; performing functions unlawfully; intentionally injuring others under the color of official authority; making a false return, certificate, official report, or other like document (Misconduct of public officer or employee ) Intentional and unlawful assumption of  public office Intentionally refusing to surrender public  office or its seal, books, papers, or other incidents to a successor or other authority entitled thereto	CC §609.43 CC §609.44	Max. 1 year imprisonment;  Max. fine $3,000
	Public officer or public employee, under color of office or employment,  intentionally asks, receives, or agrees to receive a fee or other compensation in excess of that allowed by law or where no such fee or compensation is allowed (unauthorized compensation)	CC §609.45

www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com 
https://plus.google.com/101357611930702934024
http://www.eastmetrovoterguide.com/sharon-anderson.html


NOTICE:  This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521. This E-mail is confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it.