GovernmentLibelvsMrs.Sharon4Anderson

                          LEAP YEAR 29FEB2016

        TO THE ABOVE NAMED;  Affiant Widow Mrs. Sharon Anderson will never Rest until the Murder of Sharons 2nd Husband is Abated.

                     www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com

           We do not need another Lawyer in the White House.

                                TRUMP4TRUTH

                When Government Libel the Citizenery then we have Tryanny   www.sharon4anderson.org  www.sharonvaitkin.blogspot.com

 

 

If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt ...

sdfla.blogspot.com/2008/10/if-government-becomes-lawbreaker-it.html

Oct 5, 2008 - "If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law, it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.".

 

---

From: matheny.debra@gmail.com
To: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com, hennalady@facebook.com, Bill4Dahn@aol.com, markpeterson@gmail.com
Sent: 2/29/2016 6:13:21 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Re: My case summary sent yesterday to newly appointed Sheriff Agent of the Department of Homeland Security, Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Stanek

Rich.Stanek@co.hennepin.mn.us

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Debra Matheny <matheny.debra@gmail.com> wrote:

http://bringmethenews.com/2016/02/13/mn-sheriff-picked-for-homeland-security-position-with-national-group/

I'm encouraging all victims of Minnesota's HEINOUS crimes to send your case summaries (stories of Public Servant/Political Corruption and Medical Fraud) to Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Stanek, newly appointed to the Department of Homeland Security, showing your cause for an investigation AGAINST THE ESTABLISHMENT (Elite Facilitated Systemic Corruption designed to their benefit) that nobody talks about, let alone takes action against on behalf of the victims of medical murder, real estate swindle, whistle blower, truther, justice seeker, etc., retaliation, financial fraud, etc. etc. which is aided, maintained and covered up by the very establishments whose responsibility it is to address ethics and conflicts of interest, renders us re-victimized as their campaigns to impoverish, making us state aid dependent, where we can easily be conformed, and our estates further pillaged via medicaid liens! WHICH IS THEIR ULTIMATE GOAL! Once on state health insurance (MNSURE) your medical murder can easily be facilitated under the guise of many health care complications more than not a direct result of their unethical intervention and manipulation of the once healthy victim! THIS IS NON CONSENSUAL MEDICAL EXPERIMENTATION THOUGH THE MOTIVE AND EXPECTED OUTCOME MAKES IT PREMEDITATED, INTENTIONAL HOMICIDE, ON A GRAND SCALE, EQUALS EUGENICS!
https://www.facebook.com/saved/?collection_token=100001090014116%3A586254444758776%3A92&cref=35

http://www.willmarradio.com/news/mnsure-facing-intense-spending-and-budget-questions/article_b5b8953e-cac0-11e5-89d1-2f708d3ebf5c.html

Please share this with all Minnesota Victims you're aware of.

I know of more that I don't have email addresses for.

--

Thanks,
Deb

(Debra Matheny)

--

Thank You,
Debra Matheny

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwtnZaIlfDg#t=26Sharon4Anderson@aol.com AttorneyProSe_Private AG, ECF 65913 Pacer:sa1299 Tel: 651-776-5835 HEALTH CARE CandidateMN Attorney General www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com 2014 2012Senate64 www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruption-_sharonscarrellaanderson_lawless-america/http://www.pacificlegal.org/document.doc?id=608&utm_source=Sentry+-+3%2F21%2F12+Healthcare&utm_campaign=3-21-12+Healthcare+SENTRY&utm_medium=emailhttp://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdfhttp://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com/2007/03/foia-06cv-permission-to.htmlhttp://mpls.startribune.com/news/metro/elections/profiles/26222.htmlhttp://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdfhttp://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file6.pdfwww.sharon4anderson.org http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/900-2007-02-27T034409Z/WritProA06-1150_30Jun06.pdfhttp://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/google-lawmen-cases-mn-62cv09-1163/POA http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcorr/SADPA4172006.pdfhttp://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profile/SharonScarrellaAndersonwww.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson

The latest blog posts from the Cato Institute: Donald Trump's Opinions -- and Track Record -- On Libel Law Posted on February 27, 2016 by Walter Olson Presidential candidate Donald Trump, speaking Friday: “We’re going to open up those libel laws. So when The New York Times writes a hit piece which is a total disgrace or when The Washington Post, which is there for other reasons, writes a hit piece, we can sue them and win money instead of having no chance of winning because they’re totally protected.” Trump also said of Amazon, whose Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post, a newspaper that just ran an editorial seeking to rally opposition to Trump: “If I become president, oh do they have problems. They’re going to have such problems.” The President has no direct power to change libel law, which consists of state law constrained by constitutional law as laid out by the Supreme Court in New York Times v. Sullivan. A President could appoint Justices intent on overturning the press protections of Sullivan or promote a constitutional amendment to overturn it. Assuming one or the other eventually was made to happen, further changes in libel law would probably require action at the state level, short of some novel attempt to create a federal cause of action for defamation. But although Trump is unlikely to obtain the exact set of changes he outlines, the outburst is psychologically revealing. Donald Trump has been filing and threatening lawsuits to shut up critics and adversaries over the whole course of his career. He dragged reporter Tim O’Brien through years of litigation over a relatively favorable Trump biography that assigned a lower valuation to his net worth than he thought it should have. He sued the Chicago Tribune’s architecture critic over a piece arguing that a planned Trump skyscraper in lower Manhattan would be “one of the silliest things” that could be built in the city. He used the threat of litigation to get an investment firm to fire an analyst who correctly predicted that the Taj Mahal casino would not be a financial success. He sued comedian Bill Maher over a joke. I have been writing about the evils of litigation for something like 30 years, and following the litigious exploits of Donald Trump for very nearly that long. I think it very plausible to expect that if he were elected President, he would bring to the White House the same spirit of litigiousness he has so often shown as a public figure. [cross-posted from Overlawyered] Read in browser »