SharonAnderson_vs_DFL MarkDayton_Medicare_OpenLetter

                                                  http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14773354

Thurs.23rdJan.2014

https://sites.google.com/site/sharon4anderson/Home/aolfiles

MEDICARE Ramsey Co.File 670295 Appeal HS 149632

             www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com

OPEN LETTER TO DFL MN GOV MARK DAYTON,Justice Appt. David Lillehaug,HS LUCINDA JESSON,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/201179524/SA-Appeal-670295Comb19Jan

her Employees Civil Service Darwin Lookingbill,David Gassoway,Ramsey Co.Director HS Monty Martin his Employees Ramsey county board Enbanc and all others similarily situated.

QUESTION

Has the MN Gov Mark Dayton covertly instructed County Officials to 'TAKE' Affiants Medicare Health Benefits to Force MNSURE or Obama care.

Leaving Citizenery uninsured subjected to Penaltys?

http://scannedretina.com/2014/01/09/18-usc-%c2%a7-1031-major-fraud-against-the-united-states/

Therefore: Stay Affiants Appeals until We know who we are dealing with.

http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharonsmedicareramseyco67029562cv091163

Affiant undersigned Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Scarrella

hereby states and alleges: Request that affiant be so informed what Health Care does the state Officials Public Servants have?

Pre existing Mark dayton alcoholism, David Lillehaug Throat Cancer etc. Affiant Sharons blindness 

http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-civil-rights-act-of-1866/

Click here: http://www.spingola.com/PublicServantQuestionnaire.pdf

http://www.spingola.com/PublicServantQuestionnaire.pdf

Before any further actions are taken the above named must fill out the Questionnaire, so republican candidate for www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com

Forensic Files in Right Columns re Scribd and Slideshare.'

Separation of Powers Doctrine MN const. Art. III

apparantly the HS Judges Licensed Lawyers are hired via

civil service rules? re David Gassoway are trying to exploit the Blind to deny forensic files
pdf format for easy read.  Also Affiant has not been notified of Inperson and Video Hearings
 

The Civil Service Rules are also currently available in PDF and you will need the Adobe Reader or Adobe Acrobat to download and view. To download and view, select Civil Service Rules (PDF Version) below.

Civil Service Rules (PDF Version)     http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf
Grievance Procedures

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2540276/Gene-injection-help-restore-sight-people-inherited-eye-disease-save-thousands-blindness.html#ixzz2qfUoygUu

http://www.youtube.com/user/lawlessamerica/search?query=Minnesota+Sharon+Anderson http://www.youtube.com/user/lawlessamerica/videos?query=Minnesota http://www.youtube.com/channel/UChwpfgqEZnbFH28fia8byPQ http://www.lawlessamerica.com/images/stories/GRIP/state%20legislation%20proposal-2012-09-26.pdf Sharon4Anderson@aol.com AttorneyProSe_Private AG, ECF 65913 Pacer:sa1299 Tel: 651-776-5835 HEALTH CARE Candidate 2014 MNAG www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruption www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson



Who is David Gassoway aka David E LaBarre MN Judge Human Services?

                                   Wed 22ndJan2014
                            

AFFIANT SHARON ANDERSON AKA SCARRELLA Title 5 Freedom of INFORMATION RE; Civil Service www.dhs.state.mn.us HS Judge David Galloway

By information and Belief Affiant, VA Widow, QuiTam Relator,Victim

apparantly has been DENIED in the Above entitled Cases to have Electronic Commerce pdf Briefs instead of Fax's Has David Gassoway aka Labarre with Heinous Bias against a 75 yr old Female Blind in L Eye created Under Color of Authority and Jurisdiction.

 

FURTHER; IT may be that David E. Labarre is in fact David Gassoway His e-mail states Nuteral Affiant is duly concerned that he is NOT Impartial.

                        a.   That the Consitutionality of 'TAKING' Affiants Medicare Benefits to Force

Obama Care on Sharon Anderson http://blogs.mprnews.org/newscut/2014/01/political-reality-dflers-own-a-mnsure-program-that-fails/
program that fails

Bob CollinsJanuary 22, 2014, 1:37 PMJan 22, 201434

MPR News reporter Elizabeth Stawicki’s story today on a consultant’s opinion that the state’s health insurance exchange program “won’t be fixed quickly and the state should consider the option of scrapping the system altogether and starting over,” brings us back to a question that’s lingering: Is anybody in charge listening?
As I wrote in December, so many politicians — starting with Gov. Mark Dayton — have their careers tied to MNsure that the order of the day has been denial for months. The risk of facing the problems head on is political suicide for the leaders — the state is full of “I told you so” opponents who would be happy to take their jobs.

                                                QUESTIONS

                                WHAT HEALTH CARE ARE ALL STATE,COUNTY,CITY EMPLOYEES ON?

Health in Minnesota

www.healthinminnesota.com/‎

• Cached
• Share
  View shared post

Jan 15, 2014 - In today's health news, MNsure stays under fire, this time for the state ... bring it to bear on the federal government's vast Medicare program. ... as MNsure's interim chief executive until a permanent replacement can be found.

FURTHER; Affiant left a tel message to have Inperson and Video Conference without a Response.

At all times Material Director of HS of Ramsey County Monty Martin has been Notified.

THEREFORE IT MAY BE PRUDENT FOR ANOTHER HEARING OFFICIAL FOR INPERSON AND VIDEO CONFERENCE http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf

http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

Results summary

David E LaBarre

Human Services Dept

david.gassoway@state.mn.us

651/431-2847

1. PDF]

2. See Document - Minnesota Judicial Branch

3. 1. www.mncourts.gov/.../Plaintiff_Motion_for_Temporary_Restraining_Or...‎
   2. • Cached

Attorneys Galen Robinson, David Gassoway, and Rolanda Mason ... and the Legislature alone, to make laws that, in the Court's opinion, was unconstitutional.

1. [PDF]

2. amicus brief - Minnesota State Legislature

1. www.leg.state.mn.us/.../BriefOfAmiciCuriae.pd...‎
2. • Cached
3. Minnesota Legislature
5. Loading...
7. David Gassoway (#389526) '. 430 First .... Amici acknowledge that the opinion of the Minnesota .... legislative authority, the district court' s review was - then.

Results summary

David E LaBarre

Human Services Dept

david.gassoway@state.mn.us

651/431-2847

---

From: david.gassoway@state.mn.us
To: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com, Darwin.Lookingbill@state.mn.us
CC: inta.sellars@state.mn.us
Sent: 1/22/2014 2:07:51 P.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: RE: Check out State rolls out MinnesotaCare 2.0 | Politics in Minnesota

Dear Ms. Anderson:

As the judge who will hear your upcoming appeal, I must remain neutral. As such, I ask that you do not send me any emails such as the one below. If you would like to submit information for your hearing, please do so via fax at 651-431-7523 as fax is a secure way to submit documents and information for your hearing. Any documents sent to me for the hearing must also be sent to the agency that made the decision in your case.

Any communication regarding the substance of your case sent to the judge without also sending the agency that made the decision in your case a copy, is an ex-parte communication to the judge, which is improper under applicable Minnesota statutes.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Judge Gassoway

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com [mailto:Sharon4Anderson@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:50 PM
To: Lookingbill, Darwin J (DHS); Gassoway, David E (DHS)
Cc: sharon4anderson@aol.com; ddaweb@comcast.net
Subject: Check out State rolls out MinnesotaCare 2.0 | Politics in Minnesota

Click here: State rolls out MinnesotaCare 2.0 | Politics in Minnesota

Working on Issues for Evidentary HearingPolitics in Minnesota > News > The Briefing Room > State rolls out MinnesotaCare 2.0

State rolls out MinnesotaCare 2.0

by Paul Demko
Published: June 19,2013
Time posted: 2:40 pm

In a message dated 1/21/2014 2:10:55 P.M. Central Standard Time, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com writes:

Tues 21Jan2014

Legal Notice to DHS Judge David Gassoway

Tel.651-431-2847 Fax 651-431-7523

www.dhs.state.mn.us

Request for Continuence In person Video Thanks for continuing Medical

Notice to www.stpauleye.com dr. Steffen via 227-6637 Fax 651-228-9398

 

www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com Scribd and Slideshare Files Right Side

Finding old files Count I 2014

Click here: SA Appeal 670295Comb19Jan

http://www.scribd.com/doc/201179524/SA-Appeal-670295Comb19Jan

Count 11 2009

Application http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharonsmedicareramseyco67029562cv091163

2009

MEMORANDUMN\

http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf 

http://www.youtube.com/user/lawlessamerica/search?query=Minnesota+Sharon+Anderson http://www.youtube.com/user/lawlessamerica/videos?query=Minnesota http://www.youtube.com/channel/UChwpfgqEZnbFH28fia8byPQ http://www.lawlessamerica.com/images/stories/GRIP/state%20legislation%20proposal-2012-09-26.pdf Sharon4Anderson@aol.com AttorneyProSe_Private AG, ECF 65913 Pacer:sa1299 Tel: 651-776-5835 HEALTH CARE Candidate 2014 MNAG www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruption www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson

In a message dated 1/21/2014 1:40:54 P.M. Central Standard Time, Alycia.Jacobson@state.mn.us writes:

Sharon,

Attached is the hearing notice as discussed.

Alycia

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacobson, Alycia (DHS)
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 1:13 PM
To: Jacobson, Alycia (DHS)
Subject: Send data from L5120-T755 01/21/2014 13:13

Congressional Testimony: Sharon Anderson to Bill Windsor of Lawless Ame...

Civil Rights Case Against Judge David Knutson

  http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/

http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf  http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf

http://www.co.ramsey.mn.us/NR/rdonlyres/0662DB4E-63F4-4E46-8DDF-D91E53ABB3B3/34834/A
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid2667782325001?bckey=AQ~~,AAAAAGBdRBg~,Fa2suEROi7GXAH746o0wzaiSZCyL_zeZ&bctid=2767739664001

Merck$107 millionChina plant for drugsandZioptanadversetoSharonAnderson4MNAG

Merck invests $107 million in China plant for drugs to treat diabetes  Also Eye Drops which Affiant Sharon Anderson is allergic to Zioptan   unabated by Dr. Steffen of St. Paul Eye Clinic on Grand Ave. St. Paul,MN.

Merck invests $107 million in China plant for drugs to treat diabetes

November 15, 2013 5:08 am by Staff | 0 Comments MedCity News

Share This Story

Share on emailShare on facebookShare on twitterShare on linkedinShare on printMore Sharing Services1

SHANGHAI (Reuters) - German drugmaker Merck & Co Inc has invested 80 million euros ($107.67 million) in a manufacturing plant in China, the company said on Friday, underlining the importance of the market for global drug firms.
The Shanghai-based facility will come online in 2017, producing drugs to treat China's fast growing number of diabetics as well as cardiovascular and thyroid disorders, Merck's biopharmaceutical unit said.
Spending in the country's healthcare sector is forecast to nearly triple to $1 trillion by 2020 from $357 billion in 2011, according to McKinsey, which has prompted many firms to invest in Chinese facilities and set up joint-ventures with local companies.
The investment comes as international drug companies have come under pressure in China this year with authorities clamping down on the high price premiums many of them enjoy and a number of drugmakers have been caught up in corruption allegations.

 

British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline is under investigation over allegations it funneled up to 3 billion yuan ($492.43 million) to travel agencies to facilitate bribes to doctors and officials to boost its drug sales.
Merck itself, as well as large international drugmakers Novartis AG, AstraZeneca Plc, Sanofi, Eli Lilly & Co and Bayer AG have also been questioned by Chinese officials this year.
Drugmakers have seen their sales suffer in the wake of the probes, with many Chinese doctors refusing to see drug representatives for fear of being caught up in the widening scandal.
GSK's third-quarter China sales fell 61 percent, while Sanofi lowered its 2013 profit guidance on China weakness.
Industry insiders said that despite any roadbumps, international drug firms would be unlikely to turn their back on China, which is set to be the second-biggest drugs market behind the United States by 2016, according to IMS Health.
"In 10 years it's conceivable that China will become the largest pharmaceutical market in the world," said Benjamin Bai, Shanghai-based partner at law firm Allen & Overy. "Do you think (drug firms) can afford to get out of China? No, even if it's difficult, they will find a way to adapt."
($1 = 6.0922 Chinese yuan)
($1 = 0.7430 euros)
(Reporting by Adam Jourdan)

HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in “Disparate Impact” Discrimination Cases | Judicial Watch

HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in “Disparate Impact” Discrimination Cases | Judicial Watch

---

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com, andrews@nlc.org
CC: bomberg@nlc.org, editor@blognetnews.com, editor@pioneerpress.com, editors@myvillager.com, whistleblowers@startribune.com
Sent: 11/11/2013 11:36:35 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Fwd: Colemans ElectionSt.Paul,MN Challange_RelatorSharonAndersonVAWidowSepara...

RES 13-1798 Version:1

Name:

2013 Election Canvass and Results - to be amended

Type:

Resolution

Status:

Agenda Ready

In control:

City Council

http://www.nlc.org/build-skills-and-networks/education-and-training/event-calendar/congressional-city-conference

---

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com

File #:

RES 13-1734 Version:1

Name:

Election System Replacement JPA

Type:

Resolution

Status:

Agenda Ready

In control:

City Council

Final action:

Title:

Approving the Joint Powers Agreement with Ramsey County for Election System Replacement.

Sponsors:

Kathy Lantry

Attachments:

1. proposed JPA for new voting system - final (2), 2. Appendix C spreadsheet - example of proposed capital and annual operating costs for new voting system - final, 3. memo on status of voting system acquisition

To: anthony@nlc.org, coleman@nlc.org, mark.dayton@state.mn.us, attorney.general@state.mn.us, john.choi@co.ramsey.mn.us, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, elections.dept@state.mn.us, elections@co.ramsey.mn.us, mark.ritchie@state.mn.us
CC: sharon4anderson@aol.com, fmelo@pioneerpress.com, whistleblowers@startribune.com, holdenformayor@gmail.com, chris.coleman@ci.stpaul.mn.us, shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us, kathy.lantry@ci.stpaul.mn.us, nobodies@att.net
Sent: 11/11/2013 10:45:03 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Colemans ElectionSt.Paul,MN Challenge_RelatorSharonAndersonVAWidowSeparatePowers

Mon.11Nov2013 Vets Day

Chris Coleman due to be www.nlc.org Therefore Federal Criminal Statutes may also apply.

On the Graves of our Heritage www.petersonfamilytree.blogspot.com

Grave of 2nd Husband www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com

https://www.google.com/#q=Criminal+Statutes+Election+Fraud

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=609&view=chapter MS 609.XX

City Criminal Code

http://www.ncsl.org/research/ethics/50-state-chart-criminal-penalties-for-public-corr.aspx

WED 6NOV2013 www.ci.stpaul.mn.us When Criminal Acts are Not ...

https://plus.google.com/.../posts/jTPnXAL9kGP‎

• Cached
  
• Share
  View shared post

Sharon Anderson

1 day ago - 6Nov2013 LEGAL NOTICE TO CITY ST.PAUL CANVASS BOARD made up of the St. Paul City Council and Elections to certify Results 13NOV2013. Joe Manskey ... Tales of Tyranny - The Kay Kohler Story

SEMPER FI

Grateful that Chris Coleman apparantly Won the City St.Paul Mayoral

Election But For Excessive Restrictions $500 Filing Fee

Where the Voters Misled re: Triggering Election Challenge

Constitutionality Canvass and IRV deny primary to bring out the Following Government Reform Doc.

http://www.nlc.org/influence-federal-policy

WED 6NOV2013

www.ci.stpaul.mn.us

When Criminal Acts are Not Abated then Fraud

MS60x KICKS IN COLEMANS COMPLICITY WITH TOM PEREZ

In sometimes-colorful forum, St. Paul mayoral candidates make their ...

We are Sick and Tired of Secret Meetings in City Hall

Click here: Sharon4AttorneyGeneral2015 www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com

https://stpaul.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=266708&GUID=BE6962D3-CACE-4612-A770-1375D9F7A153&Options=&Search=

Room 310, City Hall
Closed Door Session to consider the City’s strategy and position for the potential interest arbitration between the City of Saint Paul and the Saint Paul Police Federation

Wed. 6Nov2013

LEGAL NOTICE TO CITY ST.PAUL CANVASS BOARD made up of the St. Paul City Council and Elections to certify Results 13NOV2013.

Joe Manskey www.co.ramsey.mn.us

Congratulations to Chris Coleman and Thanks to Trigger www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com Campaign for MNAG

HOWEVER 4 EDUCATIONAL RULE OF LAW

AFFIANT MUST CHALLENGE THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE

CITY CANVASS BOARD AND COLEMANS ELECTION BASED

ON FRAUD COMPLICITY WITH TOM PEREZ

ISSUES;

http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf

By information and Belief the MT HOLLY case may also be dismissed by Ass

Sharons Informal Brief re: FIAFEA_FIRREA_A09-2031 ...

sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/.../sharons-informal-brief-re-fiafea_firr...‎

 

• Cached
  
• Share
  View shared post

Dec 26, 2009 - FIAFEA FIRREA Banking Regulations – Google Search ... St.Paul City Clerk shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us 651-266-8688 F 266-8574 ... RAMSEY,AUDITOR MARK OSWALD, Elections/Taxes Supervisor, Canvass Board,

You've visited this page many times. Last visit: 6/20/13

t.AG Tom Perez?

www.judicialwatch.com

 

 

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that On September 24, 2013, it filed a Freedom of Information (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ((No. 1:13-cv-01451)) against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for all records of communications regarding two controversial “disparate impact” housing discrimination cases, the first (Magner v. Gallagher) dismissed by the Supreme Court in February 2012, and the second (Township of Mt. Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens Association) now scheduled for December 4 adjudication before the Court.

Specifically, Judicial Watch seeks the following records pursuant to a July 22, 2013, FOIA request:

• Any and all records regarding the case pending in the Supreme Court as of the date of this request of Township of Mt. Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., including but not limited to communications regarding the possibility of settlement between the parties. This request applies to records regarding this case during any state of its proceedings.

• Any and all records regarding the case dismissed from the Supreme Court on February 14, 2012, of Magner v. Gallagher, including but not limited to communications regarding the dismissal of the case.

If you would like to receive weekly emails updating you about all of our efforts to fight corruption, please sign up here.

* Email
* State:	ALAKASAZARCACOCTDEDCFLGAGUHIIDILINIAKSKYLAMEMHMDMAMIMNMSMOMTNENVNMNHNJNYNCNDOHOKORPARISCSDTNTXUTVTVAWAWVWIWY

Judicial Watch Weekly Update

Under the theory of “disparate impact,” a defendant can be held liable for discrimination for a race-neutral policy that statistically disadvantages a specific minority group even if that negative “impact” was neither foreseen nor intended. In such cases, defendants can be forced to pay for harm caused not by their own actions, but by economic and statistical realities, even if beyond their control.
The Magner v. Gallagher disparate impact case arose from a lawsuit by a St. Paul minority contractor claiming that the city’s targeted enforcement of the city’s housing code against rental units reduced the availability of low-income rentals, with a disparate impact upon African-Americans. The Eighth Circuit found in the contractor’s favor, after which the city appealed to the Supreme Court. The Obama Department of Justice (DOJ) then intervened, apparently persuading St. Paul to take the extraordinary step of withdrawing its cert petition from the Supreme Court docket.
On February 13, 2012, the Wall Street Journal reported that various federal officials had asked the City of St. Paul to withdraw its petition for certiorari. The Obama administration’s concern, explained the article, was that a legal theory known as “disparate impact” might either: 1) harden into law as used by the landlords who had won at the state level or 2) be eviscerated entirely. Apparently, several federal agencies that rely on that legal theory to secure out-of-court settlements in the consumer lending and family housing arena were reluctant to risk a change in the legal landscape. The next day, the parties to Magner v. Gallagher withdrew their case by mutual consent.
Judicial Watch separately obtained documentsunder the Minnesota Data Practices Act, showing that St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing arranged a meeting between the then-chief of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, current Secretary of Labor Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before the city’s withdrawal from the case, captioned Magner v. Gallagher. Following Perez’s visit, the city withdrew its case and thanked DOJ and officials at HUD for their involvement.
The Township of Mt. Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action disparate impact case involves a redevelopment plan for Mount Holly Gardens, a 30-acre New Jersey neighborhood of run-down housing and high crime. The plan would have transformed the Gardens into mid-range single-family dwellings. Current and former residents of the Gardens banded together as Citizens in Action to sue, claiming that the plan violated the FHA because a majority of them, predominantly African-Americans and Hispanics would not be able to afford the new homes.
The district court dismissed the argument, ruling that the redevelopment plan affected Gardens residents equally, without regard to race, and was tied only to economic considerations. The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed that ruling, holding that left wing group suing the township had established a case of discrimination under the theory of disparate impact because a majority of the affected residents were non-white. On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court agreed to the township’s request to take on the issue.
On September 3, 2013, Judicial Watch filed a brief of amicus curiae with the Supreme Court on behalf of the township of Mt. Holly. In its brief, Judicial Watch argued, “Section 804(a) of the FHA prohibits only disparate treatment, not disparate impact as the Third Circuit has ruled. An analysis of the legislative history only confirms the clear language of the text.”
“We have evidence the Obama administration, through current Labor Secretary Tom Perez, improperly intervened to try to prevent the Supreme Court from shooting down is radical racial legal theories,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama administration and its liberal activist allies are desperate to preserve the discredited theory of ‘disparate impact’ to bludgeon its opponents as racists and violate equal protection under the law.”

Read more about Disparate Impact, Magner v. Gallagher, Township of Mt. Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens Association

http://www.youtube.com/user/lawlessamerica/search?query=Minnesota+Sharon+Anderson http://www.youtube.com/user/lawlessamerica/videos?query=Minnesota http://www.youtube.com/channel/UChwpfgqEZnbFH28fia8byPQ http://www.lawlessamerica.com/images/stories/GRIP/state%20legislation%20proposal-2012-09-26.pdf Sharon4Anderson@aol.com AttorneyProSe_Private AG, ECF 65913 Pacer:sa1299 Tel: 651-776-5835 HEALTH CARE Candidate 2014 MNAG www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruption www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson

St.PaulMayoral Debate: Oh God,ComplicityTomPerez ChrisColeman

Saint Paul Mayoral Debate: Oh God, you didn't just say that! | Up and At ’Em with Jack and Ben

• Edit...
• Delete...

Sharon Anderson · Sharon4Mayor2014.blogspot.com at Candidate MN Justice_and or_Senate 64

To expose High Crimes,Misdemeanors of Chris Coleman, taking a Dive and Bribe to Case Fix in the Magner Case USSC 10-1032 http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf Executive Summary * * * AsstAGThomas E.Perez made a secret deal behing closed doors with Chris Coleman Mayor

Reply · 1 · Unlike

                     Question  Will Tom Perez take or make another Dirty Deal in the MT HOLLY CASE TO BE HEARD DEC.4 2013 undermining Disparate Impact Treatment re Magner USSC 10-1032                            Has MN AG www.ag.state.mn.us  Lori Swanson willfully failed to Address.

Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc.

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
11-1507	3d Cir.	Dec 4, 2013	TBD	TBD	TBD	OT 2013

Issue: Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

• Solicitor General files invitation briefs for June 13 Conference
• Petition of the day

Date	Proceedings and Orders
Jun 11 2012	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 13, 2012)
Jul 5 2012	Waiver of right of respondent Triad Associates, Inc. to respond filed.
Jul 9 2012	Waiver of right of respondent Keating Urban Partners, L.L.C. to respond filed.
Jul 10 2012	Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 11, 2012.
Jul 12 2012	Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed.
Jul 13 2012	Brief amici curiae of National Leased Housing Association, et al. filed.
Jul 13 2012	Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc. filed.
Jul 13 2012	Brief amici curiae of American Financial Services Association, et al. filed.
Sep 11 2012	Brief of respondents Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
Sep 25 2012	Reply of petitioners Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Sep 26 2012	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 12, 2012.
Oct 15 2012	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 26, 2012.
Oct 29 2012	The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
May 17 2013	Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
May 24 2013	Reply of petitioner to brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.
May 28 2013	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 13, 2013.
Jun 17 2013	Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
Jul 3 2013	The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 26, 2013.
Jul 3 2013	The time to file respondents' briefs on the merits is extended to and including October 21, 2013.
Jul 28 2013	Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
Aug 8 2013	Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents Keating Urban Partners LLC.
Aug 26 2013	Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent Triad Associates, Inc.
Aug 26 2013	Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., et al.
Aug 26 2013	Brief of respondent Triad Associates, Inc., in support of petitioners filed.
Aug 26 2013	Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)
Aug 26 2013	Brief of petitioners Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013	Brief amici curiae of American Financial Services Association, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013	Brief amicus curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc. filed.
Sep 3 2013	Brief amici curiae of Consumer Data Industry Association, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013	Brief amici curiae of American Bankers Association, et al., filed.
Sep 3 2013	Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice in support of neither party filed.
Sep 3 2013	Brief amici curiae of National Leased Housing Association, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013	Brief amicus curiae of Project on Fair Representation filed.
Sep 3 2013	Brief amicus curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association filed.
Sep 3 2013	Brief amicus curiae of APA Watch filed.
Sep 3 2013	Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union filed.
Sep 3 2013	Brief amici curiae of American Insurance Association, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013	Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013	Brief amici curiae of Gail Heriot, et al. filed.
Sep 17 2013	SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday December 4, 2013.
Sep 17 2013	CIRCULATED
Sep 20 2013	Record from U.S. Court of Appeals for 3rd Circuit is electronic.
Sep 20 2013	Record from U.S.District Court. for District of New Jersey is electronic.
Oct 21 2013	Brief of respondents Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amicus curiae of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
Oct 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of American Planning Association and Housing Land Advocates filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of Henry G. Cisneros, former Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amicus curiae of National Community Land Trust Network filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of Housing Scholars filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of Massachusetts, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amicus curiae of Committees on Civil Rights and Administrative Law of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of Governments of San Francisco, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amicus curiae of Empower D.C. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of Legal Momentum, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of National Fair Housing Alliance, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Members of Congress filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amicus curiae of Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of The Opportunity Agenda, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of Sociologists, Social and Organizational Psychologists, and Legal Scholars filed. (Distributed

· Unfollow

Magner v. Gallagher

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
10-1032	8th Cir.	Not Argued	Feb 14, 2012	N/A	N/A	OT 2011

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own, but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?
Judgment: Dismissed - Rule 14 on February 14, 2012.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

• Fair housing case dismissed
• Petition of the day

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs for the Petitioners

• Brief for Steve Magner et al.

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners

• Brief of the International Municipal Lawyers Association et al.
• Brief of the Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey
• Brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation et al.
• Brief of the Independent Community Bankers of America et al.
• Brief of the Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc.
• Brief of the American Bankers Association et al.

Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party

• Brief of the United States

Merits Briefs for the Respondents

• Brief of Thomas Gallagher et al.

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents

• Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund
• Brief of the Lawyer’s Committee on Civil Rights et al.
• Brief of the Housing Advocates, Inc., and Buckeye Community Hope Foundation
• Brief of the National Fair Housing Alliance et al.
• Brief of the Opportunity Agenda et al.
• Brief of the ACLU
• Brief of Massachusetts et al.
• Brief of Henry G. Cisneros
• Brief of AARP and Mount Holly Gardens Citizens In Action

Certiorari-stage documents

• Opinion below (8th Cir.)
• Petition for certiorari
• Brief in opposition of respondents Thomas J. Gallagher et al.
• Petitioners' reply

Post · 5 minutes ago 

Court opinions for magner v. gallagher

Magner v. Gallagher, 132 S. Ct. 1306 - 2012 - ‎Supreme Court - Cited by 14 Magner v. Gallagher, 132 S. Ct. 994 - 2012 - ‎Supreme Court - Cited by 1 Magner v. Gallagher, 132 S. Ct. 548 - 2011 - ‎Supreme Court - Cited by 3

Search Results

1. Magner v. Gallagher : SCOTUSblog

   www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/magner-v-gallagher/‎

   • Cached
   • Similar
   • Share
     View shared post

   Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case. Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair ...

   You've visited this page many times. Last visit: 3/18/13

2. Magner v. Gallagher (10-1032) | LII / Legal Information Institute

   www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/10-1032‎

   • Cached
   • Similar
   • Share
     View shared post

   See Gallagher v. Magner, 619 F.3d 823, 830–31 (8th Cir. 2010). Gallagher alleged the City violated the Act by aggressively enforcing the City's housing codes, ...

   You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 9/25/12

3. Magner v. Gallagher | Cato Institute

   www.cato.org/publications/legal-briefs/magner-v-gallagher‎

   • Cached
   • Similar
   • Share
     View shared post

   by I Shapiro - ‎2012

   Magner v. Gallagher addresses the question of whether the FHA's ban on racial discrimination can be violated by someone who does not actually engage in ...

4. Magner v. Gallagher | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College ...

   www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2011/2011_10_1032‎

   • Cached
   • Similar
   • Share
     View shared post

   Town of Greece v. Galloway deep dive. On November 6, the Court will hear arguments in a major Establishment Clause case. Check out our deep dive on the ...

5. 10-1032 - Search - Supreme Court of the United States

   www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-1032...‎

   • Cached
   • Similar
   • Share
     View shared post

   40+ items - Steve Magner, et al., Petitioners. v. Thomas J. Gallagher, et al.

   Feb 14 2011

   Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 18, 2011).

   Jun 15 2011

   Brief of respondents Thomas J. Gallagher, et al. in opposition filed

   You've visited this page many times. Last visit: 3/18/13

6. Magner vs. Gallagher » City Hall Scoop - Blogs - Pioneer Press

   blogs.twincities.com/cityhallscoop/tag/magner-vs-gallagher/‎

   • Cached
   • Similar
   • Share
     View shared post

   Feb 13, 2012 - There's more on the Perez confirmation — and the to-and-fro related to the Magner vs. Gallagher landlord dispute — here. Here's a tidbit:.

7. LatinoJustice: Amicus Brief for Magner v. Gallagher

   latinojustice.org/briefing_room/press_releases/magner_v_gallagher/‎

   • Similar
   • Share
     View shared post

   In an amicus filed in the case Magner v. Gallagher, LatinoJustice joined the Lawyers' Committee For Civil Rights Under Law, the Leadership Conference for Civil ...

8. Magner v. Gallagher | NAACP LDF

   www.naacpldf.org/case-issue/magner-v-gallagher‎

   • Cached
   • Similar
   • Share
     View shared post

   Feb 1, 2012 - LDF filed an amicus curiae ("friend of the court") brief in the United States Supreme Court in Magner v. Gallagher. In Magner, a group of private ...

9. magner v. gallagher | Judicial Watch

   www.judicialwatch.org › Document Archive‎

   • Cached
   • Share
     View shared post

   Sep 23, 2013 - ... Projects · Financial Disclosures · Open Records Resources · Judicial Watch • Document Archive • magner v. gallagher. Document Archive