SharonsFacebookVideo

Post by Sharon Anderson.

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Sharons Eye's


Sharon Request to www.stpauleye.com Dr. Steffen



Select from calendarmm/dd/yyyy




Steffen
Grand Ave





Select from calendarmm/dd/yyyy
at

Saturday, April 20, 2013

Eye_of_Sharon_Complaint vs.DianeTanubeMD_Optometrist_LufkinClinic

Mon.15Apr.2013 FOIA DEMAND4 RECORDS
Board of Optometry > Home To the Above Named: On or about Apr22nd2012
Affiant Signature below ie: Sharon Anderson filed Charges against Diane Tanube MD
 of
Lufkin Clinic
QUESTION: After 1 year, what is the Status of Sharon Anderson's Complaint vs. Diane Tanube, and if Closed, MUST be REOPENED. Was Laser SLT necessary irreparable Harm, resulting in Blindness, Ringing in Ears,_ Brain Cells destroyed?_ Constitutionality of Cost of Eye Drops, Affiant in her then 73 years never took Eye Drops, No History of Glacoma, THEREFORE: Has Diane Tanube apparantly a Single Woman, Single Practictioner, Medical Neglience re: Victim Relator Sharon Anderson, created Glacoma when none existed.? OverRide the Cataract Diagnois of Dr. Tom Rice?
Affiant_Victim has viewed Eye Video[s at Various Clinic www.stpauleye.com
http://www.youtube.com/user/lawlessamerica/videos?query=Minnesota+Sharon+Anderson

Thumbnail13:58 Congressional Testimony: Sharon Anderson to Bi... 368 views |3 months ago

Affiant has come full Circle with now the 7th Appointment with 7 Different Eye Doc's.

In all Medicare Billings, Reports, Letter of Referral's Forensic Files re:

http://grafflaw.com/MPbook/topics/IJLMNO/mandatory_reporting_to_the_state.htm

MANDATORY REPORTING, PHYSICIANS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS


"If any individual licensed under this chapter...believes that a violation of any provision of this chapter (i.e., the Medical Practice Act) has occurred, the individual ...shall report to the Board the information upon which the belief is based. This division does not require any person or organization that is a treatment provider approved by the Board...or any employee, agent, or representative of such a provider to make reports with respect to a practitioner participating in treatment or aftercare so long as the practitioner maintains participation in accordance with the requirements of section 4731.25 of the Revised Code (impaired practitioner treatment), and so long as the...individual has no reason to believe that the practitioner has violated any provision of this chapter...or any rule of the Board other than the provisions of division (B)(26) of section 4731.22 of the Revised Code (impairment of ability to practice because of habitual or excessive use or abuse of drugs, alcohol, or other substances that impair ability to practice). ORC § 4731.224 (B)


Optometrist Members


Roger Pabst, O.D., Vice President


34453 Wacouta Trail


Redwood Falls, MN 56283


507-637-5715



www.optometryboard.state.mn.us/Cached - SimilarShare
Shared on Google+. View the post.2829 University Ave SE Suite 550 Minneapolis, MN 55414
(651) 201-2762 FAX (651) 201-2763
Hearing/Speech Relay: (800) 627-3529
Comments? email optometry.board@state.mn.us
Minnesota Statutes 148.52 - 148.62 and Minnesota Rules, chapter 6500 provide the Minnesota Board of Optometry authority to act as the licensure agency for ...

You visited this page on 4/3/13.
To Whom it may Concern: Re: Sharon Anderson's Eye Issues:


Contacting the Board re: Gregory Snyder,M.D.,DAB et ak
Main Telephone Number: 612-617-2130
Fax Number: 612-617-2166
MN Relay Service for Hearing Impaired: (800) 627-3529
Toll Free Number (MN Complaints Only): (800) 657-3709


http://www.stpauleye.com/Home/NonMenuPages/EyeCareVideo/tabid/21501/Default.aspx
http://mn.gov/health-licensing-boards/medical-practice/
Sharon4Anderson

@aol.com AttorneyProSe_Private AG
To: Sharon

This email is to notify you that the medical staff from Associated Eye Care has uploaded new documents for you to review.
Please login into your account at https://www.nextmd.com
at your earliest convenience to review these documents
Thank you, ECF 65913 Pacer:sa1299 Tel: 651-776-5835 HEALTH CARE Candidate
MN Attorney General www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com 2014 2012Senate64 www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com
http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruption-_sharonscarrellaanderson_lawless-america/http://www.pacificlegal.org/document.doc?id=608&utm_source=Sentry+-+3%2F21%2F12+Healthcare&utm_campaign=3-21-12+Healthcare+SENTRY&utm_medium=emailhttp://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdfhttp://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com/2007/03/foia-06cv-permission-to.htmlhttp://mpls.startribune.com/news/metro/elections/profiles/26222.htmlhttp://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdfhttp://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file6.pdfwww.sharon4anderson.org http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/900-2007-02-27T034409Z/WritProA06-1150_30Jun06.pdfhttp://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/google-lawmen-cases-mn-62cv09-1163/
POA http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcorr/SADPA4172006.pdfhttp://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profile/SharonScarrellaAndersonwww.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson
at

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

EdithWindsorGAY_vs_US_BillWindsorSTRAIGHT_LawlessAmerica_Disparitys

Breaking News : AFFIANT SHARON ANDERSON CANDIDATE MNAG

IS CHALLENGING CONSTITUTIONALITY

GOVERNOR DFL MARK DAYTON'S

APPOINTMENT OF DAVID LILLEHAUG

TO MN SUPREME COURT JUDGE. NOT EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW.

United States v. EDITH Windsor

Linked with:
Docket No.Op. BelowArgumentOpinionVoteAuthorTerm
12-3072d Cir. Mar 27, 2013
Tr.		 TBD TBDTBDOT 2012
Disclosure: Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) violates the Fifth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection of the laws as applied to persons of the same sex who are legally married under the laws of their State; (2) whether the Executive Branch’s agreement with the court below that DOMA is unconstitutional deprives this Court of jurisdiction to decide this case; and (3) whether the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives has Article III standing in this case.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Sep 11 2012Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due October 11, 2012)
Sep 18 2012Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 19, 2012, for all respondents.
Oct 10 2012Brief of respondent Edith Schlain Windsor, in Her Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer in opposition filed.
Oct 18 2012Judgment entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Oct 19 2012Brief of respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives in opposition filed.
Oct 26 2012Supplemental brief of petitioner United States filed.
Oct 29 2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 20, 2012.
Oct 29 2012Supplemental brief of respondent Edith Schlain Windsor, in Her Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer filed. (Distributed)
Nov 1 2012Supplemental brief of respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Nov 8 2012Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
Nov 13 2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 30, 2012.
Dec 3 2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 7, 2012.
Dec 7 2012Petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. In addition to the question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following questions: Whether the Executive Branch’s agreement with the court below that DOMA is unconstitutional deprives this Court of jurisdiction to decide this case; and whether the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives has Article III standing in this case.
Dec 11 2012Vicki C. Jackson, Esq., of Cambridge, Massachusetts, is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the positions that the Executive Branch's agreement with the court below that DOMA is unconstitutional deprives this Court of jurisdiction to decide this case, and that the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives lacks Article III standing in this case.
Dec 13 2012Briefing proposal of the parties and Court-appointed amicus curiae filed.
Dec 14 2012Upon consideration of the letter of December 13, 2012, from the Solicitor General on behalf of the litigants and the amicus curiae invited to brief and argue this case, the following briefing schedule is adopted. On the merits, the brief of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives, not to exceed 15,000 words, is to be filed on or before Tuesday, January 22, 2013. The brief of the Solicitor General, not to exceed 15,000 words, is to be filed on or before Friday, February 22, 2013. The brief of Edith Windsor, not to exceed 15,000 words, is to be filed on or before Tuesday, February 26, 2013. The reply brief of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives, not to exceed 6,000 words, is to be filed in accordance with Rule 25.3 of the Rules of this Court. On the jurisdictional questions, the brief of the Court-appointed amicus curiae, not to exceed 10,000 words, is to be filed on or before January 22, 2013. The briefs of the Solicitor General, the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives, and Edith Windsor, not to exceed 10,000 words each, are to be filed on or before Wednesday, February 20, 2013. Reply briefs of the litigants and the Court-appointed amicus curiae, not to exceed 4,000 words, are to be filed in accordance with Rule 25.3 of the Rules of this Court.
Dec 14 2012Other amici curiae briefs shall be filed within the time allowed under Rule 37.3(a) of the Rules of this Court, except that amici curiae briefs on the merits in support of the positions of the Solicitor General and/or Edith Windsor shall be filed within 7 days after the brief of the Solicitor General on the merits is filed. The litigants, Court-appointed amicus curiae, and other amici curiae shall indicate on the cover of each brief filed which issue or issues are addressed in that particular brief in addition to the information required by Rule 37.3 of the Rules of this Court.
Jan 2 2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives.
Jan 7 2013SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Jan 8 2013The time to file the brief, on the jurisdictional questions, of the Court-appointed amicus curiae is extended to and including January 24, 2013.
Jan 8 2013The time to file the briefs, on the jurisdictional questions, of the Solicitor General, the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives, and Edith Windsor, is extended to and including February 22, 2013.
Jan 10 2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.
Jan 22 2013Joint appendix filed. (Distributed) (Statement of costs received.)
Jan 22 2013Brief of respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 23 2013CIRCULATED.
Jan 24 2013Brief amicus curiae of Court-appointed amicus curiae (Jurisdiction) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 24 2013Brief amicus curiae of Family Research Council (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 24 2013Brief amicus curiae of Dr. Paul McHugh (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Jan 24 2013Brief amici curiae of Law Professors (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 24 2013Brief amicus curiae of National Organization for Marriage (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 25 2013Brief amicus curiae of Westboro Baptist Church in support of neither party (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 25 2013Brief amici curiae of Liberty, Life and Law Foundation, et al. (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Jan 28 2013Brief amicus curiae of International jurists and academics (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Jan 28 2013Brief amicus curiae of Manhattan Declaration (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 28 2013Brief amicus curiae of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amicus curiae of Coalition for the Protection of Marriage (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amici curiae of Citizens United's National Committee for Family, Faith and Prayer, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amicus curiae of United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amici curiae of Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amici curiae of Robert P. George, et al. (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amicus curiae of Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amici curiae of Indiana and 16 other states (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amicus curiae of Liberty Counsel (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amici curiae of Catholic Answers, et al. (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amicus curiae of Matthew B. O'Brien (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amicus curiae of Dovid Z. Schwartz (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amici curiae of United States Senators Orrin G. Hatch, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amicus curiae of Concerned Women for America (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amicus curiae of Helen M. Alvare filed. (Merits) VIDED. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amicus curiae of Foundation for Moral Law filed. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amici curiae of Social Science Professors (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amicus curiae of David Boyle filed. ( Merits) (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amici curiae of National Association of Evangelicals (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amici curiae of The Beverly LaHaye Institute, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Jan 29 2013Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Feb 6 2013Record from U.S.C.A. for 2nd Circuit is electronic.
Feb 13 2013Record from U.S.D.C. for Southern District of New York is electronic.
Feb 13 2013Brief amicus curiae of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Feb 22 2013Brief of respondent Edith Schlain Windsor (Jurisdiction) filed. (Distributed)
Feb 22 2013Brief of petitioner United States (Jurisdiction) filed. (Distributed)
Feb 22 2013Brief of petitioner United States (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Feb 22 2013Brief of respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (Jurisdiction) filed. (Distributed)
Feb 26 2013Brief of respondent Edith Schlain Windsor, in Her Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Feb 26 2013Motion for enlargement of time and divided argument filed by the parties and Court-appointed amici curiae.
Feb 26 2013Brief amicus curiae of GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LBGT Equality (Gay and Lesbian Medical Association) concerning the immutability of sexual orientation (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Feb 27 2013Brief amici curiae of 278 Employers and Organizations Representing Employers (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Feb 27 2013Brief amici curiae of Utah Pride Center, et al. (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Feb 27 2013Brief amici curiae of American Humanist Association and American Atheists, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
Feb 27 2013Brief amici curiae of Professors Nan D. Hunter, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Feb 27 2013Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by former Attorneys General Edwin Meese III and John Ashcroft in support of neither party (Jurisdiction) out of time.
Feb 28 2013Brief amici curiae of Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Feb 28 2013Brief amici curiae of Political Science Professors filed. (Distributed).
Feb 28 2013Brief amici curiae of Constitutional Law Scholars Bruce Ackerman, et al. (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Feb 28 2013Brief amicus curiae of American Sociological Association (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Feb 28 2013Brief amici curiae of Bishops of the Episcopal Church in the States of California, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Feb 28 2013Brief amici curiae of Family Equality Council, et al. (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Feb 28 2013Brief amici curiae of Organization of American Historians, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Feb 28 2013Brief amici curiae of Empire State Pride Agenda, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Feb 28 2013Brief amicus curiae of American Jewish Committee (Merits) filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amicus curiae of Former Federal Intelligence Officer (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amicus curiae of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amicus curiae of OutServe-SLDN Inc. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence (Jurisdiction) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute and Constitutional Accountability Center (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of National Women's Law Center, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Family and Child Welfare Law Professors (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Anti-Defamation League, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Family Law Professors, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amicus curiae of Gary J. Gates (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Dr. Donna E. Shalala, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Former Senior Justice Department Officials, et al. (Jurisdiction) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Former Senators Bill Bradley, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amicus curiae of Partnership for New York City (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Citizens United's National Committee for Family, Faith and Prayer, et al. (Jurisdiction) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amicus curiae of Survivors of Sexual Orientation Change Therapies filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of 172 Members of the U.S. House of Representatives and 40 U.S. Senators filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Los Angeles County Bar Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amicus curiae of Honorable John K. Olson (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of New York, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Services and Advocacy for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Elders, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Scholars of the Constitutional Rights of Children (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Historians, American Historical Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amicus curiae of Honorable John K. Olson (Jurisdiction) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Constitutional Law Scholars (Jurisdiction) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Federalism Scholars (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of Hon. Lawrence J. Korb, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amicus curiae of Center for Fair Administration of Taxes (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief amici curiae of American Psychological Association, et al. (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2013Brief of Former Federal Election Commission Officials (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 4 2013Motion for enlargement of time and divided argument GRANTED and the time is to be divided as follows: on the jurisdiction issues, the Court-appointed amicus curiae is allotted 20 minutes, the Solicitor General is allotted 15 minutes, and respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives is allotted 15 minutes. On the merits, respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives is allotted 30 minutes, the Solicitor General is allotted 15 minutes, and respondent Windsor is allotted 15 minutes.
Mar 15 2013Motion for leave to file amici brief out of time filed by former Attorneys General Edwin Meese III and John Ashcroft GRANTED.
Mar 19 2013Reply of respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (Jurisdiction) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 19 2013Reply of respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (Merits) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 20 2013Reply of Court-appointed amicus curiae (Jurisdiction) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 20 2013Reply of respondent Edith Schlain Windsor, in Her Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer (Jurisdiction) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 20 2013Reply of petitioner United States (Jurisdiction) filed. (Distributed)
Mar 27 2013Argued. (Juridsiction) - For Court-appointed amicus curiae: Vicki C. Jackson, Cambridge, Mass. For petitioner in support of affirmance: Sri Srinivaasan, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representataives: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C. (Merits) - For respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C. For petitioner in support of affirmance: Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent Windsor: Roberta A. Kaplan, New York, N. Y.
at
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)